Войти

The United States accused Iran of striking an American military base in Syria - media

2422
0
0
Image source: twitter

Washington. November 19. INTERFAX - A strike using drones (UAVs) in October of this year on an American military base in southern Syria was Iran's response to Israeli airstrikes in Syria, The New York Times reported, citing numerous sources from among U.S. and Israeli officials.

It writes that five UAVs were launched at the American military base At-Tanf in southern Syria on October 20, the US Central Command called it a "deliberate and coordinated" attack. Only two drones exploded on impact, they were loaded with ball bearings and shrapnel with "clear intent to kill," a senior U.S. military official told the newspaper.

As a result of the strike, no one was injured, as about 200 people from the base's personnel had been evacuated a few hours earlier, after receiving a message about an impending strike from Israeli intelligence.

The newspaper notes that, according to sources, the strike was carried out under the leadership of Iran by pro-Iranian forces in Syria, but the Pentagon representative "refused to publicly blame Iran, partly in order to avoid disruption of negotiations on the resumption of the nuclear deal with Tehran, which are scheduled to resume on November 29."

Iran has not claimed responsibility for the strike. "There have been a number of similar incidents when they accused Iran without any evidence or documents," Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Said Khatibzadeh said last week.

At the same time, sources of the publication claim that the United States and Israel have intelligence that indicates that Iran is behind the operation. Since the three UAVs did not explode, the Americans were able to study them and determine that they used the same technology as the drones used by Iranian-backed militants in Iraq.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"