Войти

NATO Secretary General avoided answering the question about the role of the alliance in case China takes military action against Taiwan

2892
0
0
Image source: © AP Photo / Francisco Seco

Washington. November 15th. INTERFAX - NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, in an interview with Axios, did not answer a journalist's question about what role the alliance would play if Beijing launches military actions against Taiwan.

"If I started answering all your hypothetical questions, I would only increase the tension that we are seeing in this region," he said.

Nevertheless, as the portal notes, "Stoltenberg has recently done a lot to expand the NATO mission, including "systemic challenges" from China."

Taiwan is not connected to NATO in any form, however, according to Axios, "its fate is connected with the opposition of the United States and the West to China's ambitions."

As reported, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, in a telephone conversation with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi last week, said that the United States is concerned about Beijing's actions against Taiwan and stands for peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait area.

"The Secretary of State stressed that the United States is consistently interested in peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait area and expressed concern about the ongoing military, diplomatic and economic pressure of the PRC on Taiwan," State Department spokesman Ned Price said.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry on Saturday informed in a message about the conversation that Wang Yi outlined to Blinken China's position on Taiwan "in response to the response to the recent incorrect words and actions of the United States" on this issue.

The Minister noted that any support for the forces advocating the independence of the island contributes to the violation of peace in the Strait and, ultimately, will have consequences."

According to him, "if the United States really wants to preserve peace in the Taiwan Strait, it must clearly and resolutely oppose any actions aimed at "Taiwan independence", adhere to the one-China policy and "stop sending wrong signals to the forces of "Taiwan independence."

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.10 05:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рванет не там, где все думают. Вот где «откроются ворота» третьей мировой"
  • 05.10 05:24
  • 1
"On the threshold of a new reality": Putin's main theses at the Valdai Forum
  • 05.10 04:53
  • 1
Trump redirected “Ukrainian” aid for NATO countries to Latin American allies (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 05.10 04:16
  • 1
The European elite has gone to war — and is rapidly losing voters (The American Conservative, USA)
  • 05.10 03:44
  • 1
На учениях «Центр» показали «Изделие 347» с управляемой ракетой
  • 04.10 21:24
  • 1
Ex-NATO official: Russia considers itself the winner, and, in my opinion, for good reason (The Independent, UK)
  • 04.10 05:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Русские не решатся: В НАТО посмеялись над ядерным оружием Москвы. Первый удар должна принять Польша"
  • 02.10 20:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вашингтон обозначил неугодные ему страны НАТО" и "«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников"
  • 02.10 17:40
  • 0
Бадалян: Пашинян проигнорировал саммит ЕАЭС из-за созданного им образа «врага» в лице Лукашенко
  • 02.10 17:34
  • 0
«Это будет другая геополитическая реальность»: в Беларуси жестко предупредили Запад о последствиях провокаций
  • 02.10 03:57
  • 1
Путин поставил кабмину новую задачу в сфере искусственного интеллекта
  • 02.10 03:47
  • 1
Washington has identified the NATO countries it dislikes
  • 01.10 21:10
  • 1
В Ленинградской области испытали новейший боевой лазер для борьбы с БПЛА
  • 01.10 21:05
  • 0
Комментарий к "China.com (Китай): что делать, когда нет денег? Еще раз продать Китаю самолеты Су"
  • 01.10 16:56
  • 0
«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников