Войти

The United States compared military spending with Russia and China

3656
0
0
Image source: Фото: Ints Kalnins / Reuters

The annual US military spending on the purchasing power index is comparable to the combined defense spending of China and Russia, writes USNI News.

It is noted that wages in China are lower than in the United States, as a result of which the former receives much more labor than the latter. It is noted that Beijing widely uses dual-use technologies, the costs of which are often taken into account as investments in the civilian sector. China is also buying modern weapons from Russia.

The publication notes that over the past 26 years, the official share of defense spending in China has remained relatively unchanged at 1.7 percent of the country's gross domestic product (GDP). Currently, Beijing's official annual defense budget is $252 billion, Washington's is $752.9 billion (3.7 percent of GDP).

Data available to USNI News indicates that official defense spending published by countries does not measure their military effectiveness.

In October, the American magazine Popular Mechanics noted that two main allied power blocs are being formed in the Indo-Pacific region, as evidenced by recent naval exercises.

In the same month, the editor-in-chief of the magazine "Arsenal of the Fatherland" Viktor Murakhovsky said RIA Novosti reports that the purchase by the United States for seven million dollars of the latest modification of the Ukrainian tank "Oplota" is explained by the interest in the development of former Soviet tank-building enterprises.


Ivan Potapov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.08 17:38
  • 0
Внутриполитическая конъюнктура растоптала «европейские ценности»
  • 05.08 15:36
  • 16358
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 05.08 06:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "Карл Маркс: философия, революции и геополитика — почему его идеи актуальны до сих пор"
  • 05.08 05:06
  • 0
Комментарий к "ПО СУЩЕСТВУ"
  • 05.08 02:36
  • 1
Ответ на вопрос "А стоит ли цитировать маршала Жукова"
  • 05.08 01:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рукопись о Баскервилях: деталь, после которой дело Холмса становится другим"
  • 05.08 01:04
  • 0
Комментарий к "Правда ли, что Россия проиграла Первую мировую из-за отсталости? Вся правда о главной военной лжи века"
  • 04.08 22:58
  • 0
Комментарий к "Медленное угасание "коалиции желающих" (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 04.08 20:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Закладка, определившая эпоху: день рождения двух морских легенд" и "Испытание океаном: история головного эсминца проекта 956, который дал имя серии"
  • 04.08 07:03
  • 1
Китайские ученые сделали ночное видение полноцветным
  • 04.08 04:51
  • 1
The slow decline of the "coalition of the willing" (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 04.08 01:30
  • 1
Комментарий к "Голодомор. Ложь и факты"
  • 04.08 01:09
  • 1
Комментарий к "Нравственный вакуум: Может ли атеизм обосновать добро? Христианство как опора человечности"
  • 04.08 00:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Города-предатели, встречавшие немцев как освободителей"
  • 03.08 23:00
  • 1
Solidly built: how do mobile firing groups work on the Tigers