Войти

Are China and Russia catching up with the US?

5536
0
0
Image source: warspot.ru

The US military power is still undeniable, but it seems that in the near future the situation may change. A new report by the RAND Corporation, a non-profit organization dedicated to Sino-Russian cooperation, indicates that the combined military power of Russia and China continues to grow rapidly.

Fragments of a 300-page document published in the journal Popular Mechanics state that China and Russia continue political rapprochement amid ongoing problems in relations with the United States. The document itself is in the public domain, and anyone can read it).

Comparison of the military power of the United States, China and Russia

Image source: rand.org

Among the theses of the document, it also appears that the prospect of joint work between Beijing and Moscow "complicates US military calculations and should lead to a reassessment of contingency plans."

It also follows from the document that the United States is the only military superpower, although Russian nuclear weapons, as well as China's military and economic power, together make it almost equal competition:"Both countries share views on the United States, in which they see a strategic competitor, and sometimes a direct opponent. And although neither of them wants war, both would like to see a more level playing field between all three countries. This is a common interest that brings Russia and China closer together."

At the same time, based on the growth schedules of various sectors of the economy and military power, it is China that is the main factor in strengthening the "bloc" of the two countries.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"