Войти

The US has recognized the effectiveness of the new missiles of Russia and China

4507
0
0
Image source: Вадим Савицкий \ РИА Новости

The United States has nothing to defend against Russian and Chinese long-range missiles. This was stated during a virtual round table on American air defense, which was organized by the Alliance on Missile Defense.

According to The National Interest, during the round table, the top military leadership emphasized the vulnerability of the United States to Chinese and Russian long-range missiles. Opponents have the opportunity to use weapons that can hit critical infrastructure in the United States from a long distance at an early stage of the conflict, said Colonel Christopher Struve, deputy director of the North American Aerospace Defense Command.

We talked about the island of Guam, it is one of the westernmost US military facilities, it is located about the same distance from Japan and Australia and only 2,700 kilometers southeast of Taiwan. Guam is becoming one of the main US bases in the western Pacific Ocean. There are several important military facilities on the island, including infrastructure for submarines and ships, as well as a large airbase where strategic bombers can be deployed.

Given the importance of Guam and the danger posed by ballistic missiles and hypersonic weapons, strengthening the island's air defense is a priority for the United States, Colonel Struve said.


Svetlana Tsygankova

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.07 23:13
  • 16222
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.07 21:13
  • 2
Why does Russia need a new tank school in the UAV era
  • 01.07 19:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Политический вопрос»: почему Турция хочет продать российские С-400 Южной Корее?"
  • 01.07 07:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украина как краеугольный камень новой европейской стратегии (The National Interest, США)"
  • 01.07 05:08
  • 1
Новейший украинский ЗРК «Риф» разместили на шасси советского ЗРК «Стрела-10»
  • 01.07 02:50
  • 1
"Political question": why does Turkey want to sell the Russian S-400 to South Korea?
  • 01.07 02:31
  • 1
Ukraine as the cornerstone of a new European strategy (The National Interest, USA)
  • 01.07 00:22
  • 2
Комментарий к "В России предложен новый способ борьбы с авианосцами США"
  • 30.06 23:56
  • 1
Британия отказалась от новых эсминцев в пользу гибридных кораблей с БЛА
  • 30.06 23:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "НАТО под давлением, Европе предстоит крупнейшее перевооружение в истории (El Pais, Испания)"
  • 30.06 22:57
  • 1
В США оценили воздушный компонент ядерной триады России
  • 30.06 18:38
  • 3
В Госдуме предложили приравнять к госизмене коррупцию в военной сфере
  • 30.06 18:14
  • 1
ОСК создаст собственный дивизион двигателестроения
  • 30.06 11:32
  • 1
Комментарий к "Украина предложила воевать только в четырех регионах. Почему Россия на это не пойдет?"
  • 29.06 19:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Для войны с Россией. На создании какого оружия сосредоточилась Европа"