Войти

In Poland, they showed the replacement of "Shilka" and "Wasps"

3736
0
0
Image source: warspot.ru

Poland is preparing to comprehensively defend its ground forces. Yesterday, October 15, the portal defence24.pl He reported that the company Polska Grupa Zbrojeniowa (PGZ) presented its solution to the SONA project, within which short-range mobile air defense systems are being developed.

It is planned that the new air defense systems will replace the "Shilki" and "Wasps" in service, providing protection to armored units and mechanized troops, both on the march and stationary. PGZ offered to combine all the latest developments of the Polish defense industry on mobile platforms, thus simplifying and reducing the cost of the product.

A promising air defense system on the Krab self-propelled gun chassis

Image source: defence24.pl

PGZ presented SONA projects based on the tracked chassis of the Krab self-propelled gun (K9) and the Rosomak wheeled APC. In the first version, the military will receive an installation armed with two 35-mm rapid-fire guns with programmable projectiles, radar, as well as Piorun missiles.

Advanced air defense system on the chassis of the Rosomak armored personnel carrier

Image source: defence24.pl

The wheeled chassis will be less load-carrying, so instead of two 35-mm guns, this version will receive only one gun, a simplified target detection system, but the same set of anti-aircraft missiles (four units with a target range of up to 12 km).

In addition, PGZ has designed command vehicles, separate radar vehicles with an extended target detection radius, as well as promising carriers of laser and electromagnetic weapons.

A model of a combat laser installation on a Rosomak APC

Image source: defence24.pl

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"