Войти

The joint response of the Russian Federation and Belarus to the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine will ensure the security of the two countries - the Kremlin

2659
0
0
Image source: rg.ru

Moscow. September 27. INTERFAX-The Kremlin says that the joint response of Moscow and Minsk to the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine should ensure the security of both Russia and Belarus.

"These are the actions that will ensure the security of our two allied states," said Dmitry Peskov, the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation, answering the question of journalists, what may be the response measures of Russia and Belarus to the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine.

"The topic of the potential expansion of NATO's military infrastructure on the territory of Ukraine has been repeatedly mentioned by President Putin, and President Putin said that this is beyond the very" red lines" that he has repeatedly spoken about, " Peskov said.

Earlier, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko said that together with Russian President Vladimir Putin, they agreed to jointly take retaliatory actions against the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine.

The Belarusian state agency "Belta" reported that Lukashenka on Monday receives a report from the leadership of the power bloc of Belarus on the situation on the state border. "Special attention is paid to the Ukrainian section - what are we going to do there? You see, they are dragging NATO troops there, to Ukraine. Under the guise of training centers, they are actually creating bases, the United States is creating bases in Ukraine. It is clear that we need to react to this, " Lukashenko said.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"