Войти

France called Australia's decision on the supply of submarines a stab in the back

3364
0
0
Image source: Фото: ТАСС/EPA/RICHARD WAINWRIGHT

French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian on Thursday, September 16, called Australia's decision to break the agreement with the French company Naval Group on the construction of submarines a stab in the back.

"This is really a stab in the back. We have established a trusting relationship with Australia. This trust has been undermined. And today I am angry about the termination of this contract," Le Drian said on the air of France Info radio station.

The minister stressed that he expects explanations from Australia, as well as the United States.

Earlier in the day, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced that the country is withdrawing from an agreement with France on the construction of submarines for $66 billion.

According to him, the implementation of nuclear submarine technology has pushed the state to abandon conventional Attack-class submarines. The prime minister said that "accelerating changes in the field of regional security make conventional submarines unsuitable" for Australia's operational needs in the coming decades.

Morrison noted that France will continue to be a partner of Australia. He also expressed hope that the states will be able to overcome the consequences of the "difficult and disappointing" decision.


On September 15, Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom announced the creation of the AUKUS trilateral Security and Defense Partnership. Over the next year and a half, all three countries will work on transferring technology to Australia, which the US has traditionally shared only with the UK. We are talking, in particular, about nuclear submarines.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.08 02:20
  • 0
Об эсминцах, раз уж пошел разговор о возобновлении их постройки в РФ
  • 01.08 00:27
  • 0
Комментарий к "Один стационарный С-200 закрывал площадь сорока дивизионов С-75"
  • 31.07 19:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ"
  • 31.07 19:02
  • 2
Russia has announced its first destroyer program in 40 years. Urgently needed: Ocean-going warships (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
  • 31.07 18:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Россия объявила о первой за 40 лет программе создания эсминцев. Срочно требуются: океанские боевые корабли (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 31.07 18:37
  • 16347
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 31.07 18:09
  • 1
Госкомвоенпром: ОАО "АЛЕВКУРП" усовершенствовало оптико-электронную систему для ЗРК
  • 31.07 18:00
  • 1
Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ
  • 31.07 17:37
  • 1
Sea revenues: The Caspian Flotilla acquired its own aircraft
  • 31.07 17:18
  • 1
Минобороны: Россия обладает опытом создания масштабных группировок ПВО
  • 31.07 07:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чем же была более всего сильна промышленность Российской империи"
  • 31.07 05:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чего Европе ждать от задуманной США “НАТО 3.0”? (The Spectator, Великобритания)"
  • 31.07 05:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия потерпеть поражение в Первой Мировой Войне?"
  • 31.07 01:56
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Суворов взял «неприступный» Измаил, имея меньше солдат, чем защитников"
  • 31.07 01:37
  • 1
What can Europe expect from the US-conceived “NATO 3.0”? (The Spectator, UK)