Войти

The IAEA's conclusions about the resumption of the operation of a nuclear reactor in the DPRK are probably far-fetched-source

2024
0
0
Image source: Национальное телевидение КНДР

Moscow. September 5. INTERFAX-The IAEA report, which declares the resumption of the operation of a nuclear reactor in North Korea's Yongbyon, is not supported by weighty evidence, an informed source told Interfax.

According to the interlocutor of the agency, the evidence given in the report of the resumption of the reactor's operation is the discharge of hot water recorded on satellite photos, traces of the activity of the radiochemical laboratory - smoke coming from the pipe of the boiler house located on its territory.

"This is still a pull by the ears. I am not at all sure that the release of water, which is visible from the satellite, is the resumption of work. The resumption of the reactor's operation is a much more serious event, " he added.

According to the source, from a military-technical point of view, such measures are currently useless for the DPRK, "there is no goal that such actions could help achieve."

He admitted that the launch of the reactor could be used by the DPRK as a " means of provocation, urging the United States to dialogue," but expressed doubt that Pyongyang had taken this path.

The IAEA, in a report published last Monday, said that North Korea probably resumed work on the production of fuel for nuclear weapons at the main nuclear complex in Yongbyon from July 2021.

According to the data presented in the report, we are talking about a five - megawatt reactor at a facility that produces plutonium-one of the key components for the production of nuclear weapons.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 19.03 12:09
  • 698
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 19.03 11:57
  • 1
Persuasion Strike: Contrary to US statements, Iran continues to attack
  • 19.03 11:51
  • 2
ЦАМТО: союзники США заняли выжидательную позицию после призыва Трампа отправить корабли в Персидский залив
  • 19.03 01:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали оружие для удара по кораблям Китая"
  • 19.03 00:39
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали Су-57 угрозой для F-35"
  • 19.03 00:36
  • 15034
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 18.03 11:10
  • 2
Во Франции обеспокоились российскими ракетами
  • 18.03 10:55
  • 1
США потеряли около 12 БЛА MQ-9 Reaper в ходе вооруженного конфликта с Ираном
  • 18.03 10:50
  • 1
The engineer received three years for passing on the secrets of Varshavyanka
  • 18.03 01:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "Полковник перечислил самое мощное оружие России в зоне СВО"
  • 17.03 21:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "НАТО усиливает патрулирование в Арктике. Главная цель — обнаружить российские подлодки, пока они не ушли на глубину (Business Insider, Германия)"
  • 17.03 21:00
  • 0
Комментарий к "Может ли НАТО разместить ядерное оружие в Финляндии? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 17.03 19:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "США ударом ATACMS затопили российскую «Варшавянку» в Иране"
  • 17.03 18:49
  • 2
США ударом ATACMS затопили российскую «Варшавянку» в Иране
  • 17.03 18:31
  • 1
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran