Войти

The IAEA's conclusions about the resumption of the operation of a nuclear reactor in the DPRK are probably far-fetched-source

2281
0
0
Image source: Национальное телевидение КНДР

Moscow. September 5. INTERFAX-The IAEA report, which declares the resumption of the operation of a nuclear reactor in North Korea's Yongbyon, is not supported by weighty evidence, an informed source told Interfax.

According to the interlocutor of the agency, the evidence given in the report of the resumption of the reactor's operation is the discharge of hot water recorded on satellite photos, traces of the activity of the radiochemical laboratory - smoke coming from the pipe of the boiler house located on its territory.

"This is still a pull by the ears. I am not at all sure that the release of water, which is visible from the satellite, is the resumption of work. The resumption of the reactor's operation is a much more serious event, " he added.

According to the source, from a military-technical point of view, such measures are currently useless for the DPRK, "there is no goal that such actions could help achieve."

He admitted that the launch of the reactor could be used by the DPRK as a " means of provocation, urging the United States to dialogue," but expressed doubt that Pyongyang had taken this path.

The IAEA, in a report published last Monday, said that North Korea probably resumed work on the production of fuel for nuclear weapons at the main nuclear complex in Yongbyon from July 2021.

According to the data presented in the report, we are talking about a five - megawatt reactor at a facility that produces plutonium-one of the key components for the production of nuclear weapons.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.07 19:23
Комментарий к "«Политический вопрос»: почему Турция хочет продать российские С-400 Южной Корее?"
  • 01.07 10:46
  • 16221
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.07 07:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украина как краеугольный камень новой европейской стратегии (The National Interest, США)"
  • 01.07 05:08
  • 1
Новейший украинский ЗРК «Риф» разместили на шасси советского ЗРК «Стрела-10»
  • 01.07 02:50
  • 1
"Political question": why does Turkey want to sell the Russian S-400 to South Korea?
  • 01.07 02:31
  • 1
Ukraine as the cornerstone of a new European strategy (The National Interest, USA)
  • 01.07 00:22
  • 2
Комментарий к "В России предложен новый способ борьбы с авианосцами США"
  • 30.06 23:56
  • 1
Британия отказалась от новых эсминцев в пользу гибридных кораблей с БЛА
  • 30.06 23:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "НАТО под давлением, Европе предстоит крупнейшее перевооружение в истории (El Pais, Испания)"
  • 30.06 23:06
  • 1
Why does Russia need a new tank school in the UAV era
  • 30.06 22:57
  • 1
В США оценили воздушный компонент ядерной триады России
  • 30.06 18:38
  • 3
В Госдуме предложили приравнять к госизмене коррупцию в военной сфере
  • 30.06 18:14
  • 1
ОСК создаст собственный дивизион двигателестроения
  • 30.06 11:32
  • 1
Комментарий к "Украина предложила воевать только в четырех регионах. Почему Россия на это не пойдет?"
  • 29.06 19:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Для войны с Россией. На создании какого оружия сосредоточилась Европа"