Войти

Rogozin spoke about the conditions of the transfer of the " Sea Launch»

2136
0
-2
Image source: Фото: Евгений Биятов / РИА Новости

The Sea Launch floating spaceport can't compete with Elon Musk's SpaceX. This is reported by RIA Novosti with reference to the General Director of Roscosmos Dmitry Rogozin.

Speaking during parliamentary hearings in the State Duma, Rogozin spoke about the conditions for the transfer of the Sea Launch to the Russian company S7. According to the head of the state corporation, the cosmodrome was sold on the condition that it "cannot be used in competition with Elon Musk."

"All right? That is, the US government, government lawyers act as a client, in fact, a private company. Or maybe it is not a private company in this case, if with the help of state sanctions, we are restricted from competing with SpaceX? " - Rogozin was surprised.

Summing up the conversation, the head of Roscosmos noted that before the sale of the Sea Launch ,the American side " pulled out and cut out all the equipment on these ships." Rogozin noted that the restoration of the cosmodrome will require tens of billions of rubles.

Work on the creation of a floating spaceport, which at that time was an international project, began in 1995. In 2009, Sea Launch declared bankruptcy. Since 2018, the launch pad has been taken over by S7.

In October , it became known that 28 billion rubles are needed to restore the "Sea Launch". In the summer of 2020, journalists reported with reference to Rosatom that the cost of the floating cosmodrome is 11 billion rubles.


Andrey Stavitsky

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 20.04 05:13
  • 8480
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.04 04:55
  • 1
О противостоянии ЗРС и ЛА
  • 20.04 01:10
  • 11
Военкор: без десантных операций мощного прорыва обороны ВСУ российской армией можно не ждать
  • 20.04 00:29
  • 0
Ответ на "Эксперт Коротченко: истребитель F-16 ВСУ могли сбить ЗРС С-300В4 или ЗРК "Бук""
  • 19.04 20:12
  • 0
Ответ на ""Откуда взялась третья ракета?" Как был сбит украинский F-16"
  • 19.04 12:49
  • 2
19FortyFive: США могут забыть о F-47, поскольку Китай строит один истребитель-«невидимку» за другим
  • 19.04 02:48
  • 1
О Ту-22Мn, -95М, -160, Су-34, и ПАК ДА
  • 19.04 01:05
  • 0
Ответ на "На Западе назвали украинские F-16 устаревшими"
  • 18.04 13:35
  • 2
The Ukrainian BMPT "Sentinel" based on the T-64BV turned out to be a stillborn project
  • 18.04 04:20
  • 4
Ответ на "Российский бомбардировщик Ту-160М: самое неожиданное возвращение (19FortyFive, США)"
  • 17.04 06:53
  • 1
В НАСА заявили о готовности модулей станции Gateway
  • 17.04 06:33
  • 0
Ответ на "Будет ли военно-морской флот России сотрудничать с Китаем, чтобы бросить вызов гегемонии США на море? (Tencent, Китай)"
  • 17.04 02:04
  • 0
Ответ на " Названа новая задача Су-35С"
  • 17.04 01:58
  • 1
Will the Russian Navy cooperate with China to challenge U.S. hegemony at sea? (Tencent, China)
  • 16.04 15:59
  • 1
The last of the Mohicans and the flying "Chinese": what disappoints the 6th generation of US aircraft