Войти

Rogozin criticized plans to send people to Mars in the near future

2011
0
-1
Image source: © NASA/JPL-Caltech via AP

Saint-Petersburg. June 5. INTERFAX-Humanity is not ready for flights to Mars in the near future, the corresponding plans are technically illiterate and absurd, said the head of Roscosmos Dmitry Rogozin.

"Often (space lovers-IF) become hostages of people's fantasies, which attract them not as ordinary people, but as potential investors in certain space projects. They are captivated by stories that humanity is about to fly to Mars soon. But people who are technically dedicated understand that this is completely absurd, " Rogozin said at a session of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum.

"In order to fly to Mars, you need a launch window, this is every two years. And then this flight is up to nine months. How to cram a hundred people like sprats in a jar, without being able to move for nine months? Then they will wait there for the launch window, so that they can quickly get out of there and fly back to Earth like sprats in a tin can. And you know, people like it. I call this the "Wow" effect. In fact, there is nothing behind this, except the usual move of a marketer, " Rogozin said.

The head of Roscosmos did not specify who he meant, but noted that "there are quite a lot of such people."

Earlier it was reported that the American company SpaceX is testing the Starship. It is designed for flights to the Moon and Mars. In the manned version, the ship will be able to take on board up to 100 people.

In early December last year, the head of SpaceX, Elon Musk, said that his rocket will be able to land people on Mars in 2026.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"