Войти

China three times refused to accept the call of the head of the Pentagon

2475
0
0
Image source: Фото: Kenzo Tribouillard/Pool via Reuters

The Chinese side three times refused to accept a phone call from the head of the Pentagon, Lloyd Austin, who, in violation of protocol, requested a conversation not with the Minister of Defense, but with a higher-ranking official. This was reported on May 26 by the South China Morning Post, citing military sources.

"A Chinese military source said that there was a misunderstanding when US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin requested a conversation with the Deputy Chairman of the Central Military Council, Xu Qiliang, thus insulting the Ministry of Defense," the newspaper reports.

According to the source, Austin's colleague from the Chinese side is Defense Minister Wei Fenghe, and not Xu Qiliang — the second person in the structure of the Central Military Commission, which is headed by Chinese President Xi Jinping himself.

The source noted that despite the fact that both officials report directly to Xi Jinping, according to diplomatic protocol, the Pentagon's interlocutor should be Defense Minister Wei Fenghe.

Experts interviewed by the South China Morning Post note that almost all intergovernmental and military channels of communication between China and the United States were suspended after bilateral talks in March this year in Alaska, which ended in a public scandal and an exchange of claims.

Some experts disagreed that Austin's request was a violation of diplomatic protocol. Zhu Feng, a professor at Nanjing University and an expert on international relations, said that the reason for the incident is the poor operation of communication channels.

"Content is more important than job titles. The parties should not be interested in the job titles of their partners, they should think about their powers, " the expert said.

On March 19, CCTV reported that at the talks in Anchorage (Alaska), the US authorities showed unfriendliness to the Chinese delegation. It was noted that in the opening speech, the US delegation "blamed" China's foreign and domestic policy, exceeded the agreed time limit, which violates diplomatic protocol. U.S. officials accused their Chinese counterparts of violating protocol during the talks.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 31.01 11:32
  • 13929
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 31.01 10:01
  • 2
Технологии «Буревестника» применили в космических программах
  • 31.01 09:25
  • 1
Китайский аналог российской Р-37М показали крупным планом
  • 31.01 04:54
  • 2
"The time of the Guards tank divisions is irrevocably gone"
  • 30.01 17:41
  • 2
В России оценили развитие «железных сердец» танков
  • 30.01 07:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гренландия не обеспечит Америке безопасность в Арктике. А этот регион обеспечит (The Washington Post, США)"
  • 30.01 03:01
  • 1
Greenland will not provide America with security in the Arctic. And this region will provide (The Washington Post, USA)
  • 30.01 02:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Военный историк Найтцель предупреждает: "Мы не должны недооценивать Россию" (Bild, Германия)"
  • 30.01 01:50
  • 1
На верфи ST Engineering заложен киль второго корабля MRCV для ВМС Сингапура
  • 30.01 01:35
  • 1
Глава военного комитета НАТО высказался против европейской армии
  • 30.01 01:25
  • 1
Three scenarios for the development of the conflict in Ukraine in 2026 from the American press
  • 30.01 00:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "На Западе назвали условие уничтожения России"
  • 29.01 23:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США у российского Су-35 нашли серьезную проблему"
  • 29.01 21:03
  • 2
Пашинян рассказал о результатах выхода Армении из ОДКБ
  • 29.01 17:49
  • 2
The United States linked security guarantees to Ukraine with the surrender of Donbass (The Times, UK)