Войти

In the UK, they recognized the inability of the United States to build the ISS without Russia

2025
0
0
Image source: Фото: Globallookpress.com

In the 1990s and later, the United States and its allies depended on Russia for practical technologies of modular space stations, manned space exploration and cargo delivery to near-Earth space, which is no longer observed at the present time, says the British newspaper Financial Times.

Director of the National Space Center (Great Britain) Anu Oja, who was interviewed by the publication, admitted that NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) were unable to build the International Space Station (ISS) without the participation of Russia. "The Russians were masters of building modular space stations," the expert said.

The newspaper writes that, in addition to experience in the construction of modular stations, the Western side needed " Russian equipment to deliver materials and people to the ISS and back." The publication notes that this dependence increased ten years ago, when the United States stopped operating the Space Shuttle, fully trusting the Russian "Unions".

According to the Financial Times, NASA's dependence on Roscosmos disappeared after the appearance of the SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft. The publication notes that the US cooperation with Russia provided "Roscosmos", "experiencing a shortage of funds", "the necessary access to Western funding."

The Financial Times recalls that Russia has now refused to participate in the international lunar project Artemis, which is being worked on under the leadership of the United States, and in the field of space, instead of cooperating with the West, it is strengthening cooperation with China.

In April, the general director of Roscosmos, Dmitry Rogozin , said that the state corporation, after withdrawing from the ISS project, allows the transfer of the Russian segment of the orbital laboratory to NASA. According to the manager, the Russian segment of the station is worn out by 80 percent, and its maintenance "will require approximately the same funds that will be needed from 2025 for the deployment of a separate national Russian orbital station."


Ivan Potapov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 03.12 22:53
  • 11789
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 03.12 20:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали победителя дуэли между Су-57 и китайским J-35A"
  • 03.12 19:27
  • 0
Комментарий к "Восемь лучших в мире американских и российских истребителей (The National Interest, США)"
  • 03.12 17:31
  • 116
Обзор программы создания Ил-114-300
  • 03.12 14:41
  • 1
В России оценили вооружение корейских Су-25
  • 03.12 12:53
  • 16
В США перспективы российского Су-75 сравнили с «полетом фантазии»
  • 03.12 11:02
  • 1
Баканов: частные компании сократят время от разработки до внедрения технологий
  • 03.12 09:12
  • 14
Прогнозы Илона Маска: ИИ полностью заменит работающих за компьютерами. Приложения исчезнут, а звук и изображение будет создавать ИИ
  • 03.12 07:47
  • 0
Ответ на ""Четыре великих защитника" России сдерживают Запад от опрометчивых действий (Sohu, Китай)"
  • 03.12 00:18
  • 1
Российский истребитель первым в мире уничтожил западную систему Patriot
  • 02.12 23:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Полетел ли долгожданный Су-57М? Что стоит за новостями об испытаниях улучшенного варианта (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 02.12 17:02
  • 1
  • 02.12 16:58
  • 1
УЗГА: самолет УТС-800 сконструирован с возможностью модернизации
  • 02.12 09:22
  • 1
Комментарий к "На земле, в море, в воздухе… Чего бы стоила европейская армия против России?"
  • 02.12 08:51
  • 9
World Time of Troubles: does Europe really want to fight - TASS Opinions