Войти

The head of USC spoke about the problems with the project of the destroyer " Leader"

Sections: Sea, New development
4369
1
+1
Image source: CC BY-SA 4.0 / Artem Tkachenko / Макет эсминца "Лидер" на выставке "Армия 2015"

MOSCOW, April 15-RIA Novosti. The project of construction of the destroyer "Leader" for the Russian Navy is unlikely to be implemented, said in an interview with RIA Novosti General Director of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) Alexey Rakhmanov.

"In the form in which it was planned earlier, it will most likely not be implemented, at least not so quickly. But here everything depends on the decision of the customer-the Ministry of Defense, " he said.

Initially, the " Leader "was planned to be laid in 2017, but construction has not yet begun. There is also no technical project of the destroyer, the former deputy commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy for armament Viktor Bursuk said that the document should have been developed in 2019-2020.

Admiral Viktor Chirkov, when he was the commander-in-chief of the Navy, stressed that a new-generation destroyer should have a nuclear power plant, its displacement should be about 14 thousand tons.

Later, a number of media outlets reported on the decision to increase the displacement to 19 thousand tons. There were two possible versions of the ship: the first-with a displacement of 10-12 thousand tons with a gas turbine power plant and the second – 18-19 thousand tons with a nuclear power plant.

Currently, the Russian Navy has one surface ship with a nuclear power plant - the heavy nuclear missile cruiser "Peter the Great".

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Компании
Проекты
Comments [1]
№1
16.04.2021 11:48
Кто бы сомневался.
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.07 12:24
  • 3
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 21.07 05:46
  • 8
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 21.07 03:48
  • 1
Российские порты прикрыли «Корветом»
  • 21.07 03:43
  • 1
США создали дешевый Patriot
  • 21.07 03:35
  • 1
Will the Europeans fight if it comes to that? (The Economist, UK)
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"
  • 20.07 15:47
  • 1
An unmanned project
  • 20.07 15:24
  • 16312
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.07 12:23
  • 198
Russia has launched production of 20 Tu-214 aircraft
  • 20.07 06:19
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 20.07 05:26
  • 0
По поводу ОЧЕНЬ интересной темы - сравнения танков.
  • 19.07 19:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Первую Мировую войну «забыли»?"
  • 19.07 03:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия избежать участия в Первой Мировой?"
  • 19.07 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Лучше быть голодными, чем русскими»: Шахназаров узнал от латыша, почему Латвия так относится к России"
  • 19.07 02:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Мифы о нелепых атаках"