Войти

The head of USC spoke about the problems with the project of the destroyer " Leader"

Sections: Sea, New development
3765
1
+1
Image source: CC BY-SA 4.0 / Artem Tkachenko / Макет эсминца "Лидер" на выставке "Армия 2015"

MOSCOW, April 15-RIA Novosti. The project of construction of the destroyer "Leader" for the Russian Navy is unlikely to be implemented, said in an interview with RIA Novosti General Director of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) Alexey Rakhmanov.

"In the form in which it was planned earlier, it will most likely not be implemented, at least not so quickly. But here everything depends on the decision of the customer-the Ministry of Defense, " he said.

Initially, the " Leader "was planned to be laid in 2017, but construction has not yet begun. There is also no technical project of the destroyer, the former deputy commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy for armament Viktor Bursuk said that the document should have been developed in 2019-2020.

Admiral Viktor Chirkov, when he was the commander-in-chief of the Navy, stressed that a new-generation destroyer should have a nuclear power plant, its displacement should be about 14 thousand tons.

Later, a number of media outlets reported on the decision to increase the displacement to 19 thousand tons. There were two possible versions of the ship: the first-with a displacement of 10-12 thousand tons with a gas turbine power plant and the second – 18-19 thousand tons with a nuclear power plant.

Currently, the Russian Navy has one surface ship with a nuclear power plant - the heavy nuclear missile cruiser "Peter the Great".

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Компании
Проекты
Comments [1]
№1
16.04.2021 11:48
Кто бы сомневался.
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 17.09 04:50
  • 0
Ответ на "На Западе предупредили о превосходстве России в возможностях ПКР"
  • 17.09 04:05
  • 0
Ответ на "В Госдуме рассказали о готовности применить против Европы мощное оружие"
  • 17.09 02:05
  • 0
Ответ на "Стало известно о превосходстве алжирских Су-34 над российскими"
  • 17.09 00:40
  • 0
Вот интересная тема: поверим, что евроНАТО готовится к "отражению российской агрессии".
  • 17.09 00:13
  • 10528
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 16.09 23:05
  • 1
«Росэл» начинает выпуск новой линейки отечественных серверов для ИИ
  • 16.09 22:55
  • 0
Ответ на "«Крупнейшая модернизация в истории»: Чехия подвела итоги подготовки к войне"
  • 16.09 17:49
  • 1
«Крупнейшая модернизация в истории»: Чехия подвела итоги подготовки к войне
  • 16.09 16:53
  • 40
Горечь от потерь России в Сирии навеяла мысли о Калмыкии
  • 16.09 07:11
  • 83
ChatGPT-4 и нейросети (ИИ) спешат на помощь ГШ ВС РФ и Российской армии
  • 16.09 03:01
  • 1
Winter in Ukraine is just around the corner: What needs to be done to keep the lights on (CNN, USA)
  • 16.09 00:18
  • 0
Ответ на "В США напомнили о провале разрекламированного «Команча»"
  • 16.09 00:05
  • 1
Demonstration with force: what weapons were shown at the DSEI-2025 exhibition
  • 15.09 23:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "На Западе оценили модернизацию российских «Прорывов»"
  • 15.09 21:25
  • 1
О ВМФ РФ и евроНАТО