Войти

The US decided to leave the aircraft carrier Nimitz in the Persian Gulf

Sections: Sea, Global safety
2488
0
-1
Image source: Фото: TASS/Zuma/Petty Officer 3rd Class Keenan D

Pentagon Chief Chris Miller said on Sunday, January 3, that the United States, after threats from Iran, left the Nimitz aircraft carrier in the region, which was planned to be withdrawn from there.

He stressed that the ship will remain on duty in the area of operations of the US Central Command.

"Because of the recent threats made by Iranian leaders against President (US) Donald Trump and other US officials, I have ordered Nimitz to stop its usual relocation, "Miller was quoted as saying by RIA Novosti.

The head of the Pentagon did not specify which threats of the Iranian leadership led to such a decision.

Earlier, on November 30, it became known that the American carrier strike group led by the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Nimitz after passing the Strait of Hormuz entered the waters of the Persian Gulf. Earlier it was reported that the aircraft carrier was decided to relocate to another location.

On January 2, it was reported that US intelligence agencies believe that Iran has increased the level of combat readiness of part of its naval forces over the past 48 hours.

Earlier, on January 1, Iran's Charge d'affaires to the UN, Eshag al-Habib, asked the UN Security Council and the international community to call on the United States to stop destabilizing actions in the Persian Gulf. According to him, in recent weeks, "US military adventurism" has intensified in the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea. He added that the United States has delivered high-tech weapons to these territories.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"