Войти

Exclusive BTR: what is the difference between the Chinese WZ-523 for Namibia

2800
0
0
Image source: rg.ru

WZ-523 armored personnel carriers were created in the first half of the 80's with an export orientation.

In the course of development, components and assemblies of mass-produced automotive equipment were widely used, for example, a 165-horsepower gasoline engine.

When designing the hull, Chinese designers were clearly inspired by the ideas they had seen from cars from Belgium, Brazil and South Africa.

The result was a three-axle all-wheel-drive APC weighing 11,200 kg with a crew of three military personnel, capable of carrying eight infantrymen.

It has Windows and loopholes cut in the sides, and in the stern there is a large hatch that serves for the entrance and exit of fighters.

The WZ-523 can travel at a maximum speed of up to 85 km / h on the highway and up to 7 km / h when crossing water obstacles.

The main weapons used are versions of the 12.7 mm W85 machine gun.

However, there are also exclusive options, such as the modification serving in the Namibian army with a tower, which can be seen on the Soviet BMP-1 and their Chinese type 86 clones, also known as WZ-501.

They use 73-mm guns as weapons, which include cumulative anti-tank and high-explosive fragmentation ammunition. They are paired with 7.62 mm machine guns.

There are also guided missile systems Red Arrow-73, copied from the famous "Baby".

A total of two dozen WZ-523s were delivered to Namibia. Several other African countries operate about a hundred of these APCS.


Alexey Moiseev

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 02.03 11:03
  • 14760
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 02.03 05:46
  • 163
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 02.03 01:41
  • 1
В связи с происходящим: комментарий на "Сначала выведут из строя ПРО Москвы: Готов план удара по России. В ответ – ядерный взрыв у берегов Британии?"
  • 01.03 22:08
  • 0
По поводу "СВОЕВРЕМЕННЫЕ СПОРЫ"
  • 01.03 07:47
  • 0
Не в тему сайта, но все-таки не совсем off-top. Комментарий к "Почему в России хоккей честнее и сильнее футбола?"
  • 01.03 01:23
  • 1
Комментарий к "Рютте: НАТО нужно увеличить мощность ПВО в пять раз"
  • 28.02 21:05
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вмятины на атомных подлодках ВМФ России объяснили"
  • 28.02 20:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США ужаснулись Ирану в «безвыходном положении»"
  • 28.02 15:48
  • 1
The Russian 350nm photolithograph was estimated at 500 million rubles.
  • 28.02 07:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Запад растранжирил годы, которые нам пожертвовала Украина (The Times, Великобритания)"
  • 27.02 11:45
  • 1
Forget about Greenland: Russia has already settled on this Arctic island of NATO (The Wall Street Journal, USA)
  • 27.02 09:07
  • 102
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 27.02 07:24
  • 1
В США оценили крупнейшие танковые силы в мире
  • 27.02 06:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "США обозначили угрозу с воздуха в будущем"
  • 27.02 02:15
  • 1
The United States has identified a threat from the air in the future