Войти

Part of the Armenian ZSU-23-4 "Shilka" that fought in Karabakh did not have locators

4680
0
0

Image source: vestnik-rm.ru

In the course of hostilities in Nagorno Karabakh, Armenian armed forces have used various means of defense. Mostly, these were outdated systems created in the sixties and seventies. For example, the ZSU-23-4 Shilka self-propelled anti-aircraft gun.

Moreover, according to a report published by the HetqTV channel, some of the vehicles had their radar stations dismantled.

According to military experts, this is due to the fact that the Armenian side, due to a shortage of spare parts, experienced problems with maintaining such equipment in working condition. In addition, the old radars could unmask the location of combat vehicles and were easily suppressed by interference.

Image source: vestnik-rm.ru

In some countries, where" Shilkam " extend the operating time, ZSU install special sighting stations with thermal imagers, television cameras, laser rangefinders. Weapons are reinforced with missiles with infrared guidance systems.

Nothing like this can be seen on Armenian self-propelled guns. If such upgrades were carried out, they would be able to cover ground troops more effectively.

Dmitry Lemeshko

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 19.04 23:25
  • 8478
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 19.04 20:12
  • 0
Ответ на ""Откуда взялась третья ракета?" Как был сбит украинский F-16"
  • 19.04 15:42
  • 10
Военкор: без десантных операций мощного прорыва обороны ВСУ российской армией можно не ждать
  • 19.04 12:49
  • 2
19FortyFive: США могут забыть о F-47, поскольку Китай строит один истребитель-«невидимку» за другим
  • 19.04 02:48
  • 1
О Ту-22Мn, -95М, -160, Су-34, и ПАК ДА
  • 19.04 01:05
  • 0
Ответ на "На Западе назвали украинские F-16 устаревшими"
  • 18.04 13:35
  • 2
The Ukrainian BMPT "Sentinel" based on the T-64BV turned out to be a stillborn project
  • 18.04 04:20
  • 4
Ответ на "Российский бомбардировщик Ту-160М: самое неожиданное возвращение (19FortyFive, США)"
  • 17.04 06:53
  • 1
В НАСА заявили о готовности модулей станции Gateway
  • 17.04 06:33
  • 0
Ответ на "Будет ли военно-морской флот России сотрудничать с Китаем, чтобы бросить вызов гегемонии США на море? (Tencent, Китай)"
  • 17.04 02:04
  • 0
Ответ на " Названа новая задача Су-35С"
  • 17.04 01:58
  • 1
Will the Russian Navy cooperate with China to challenge U.S. hegemony at sea? (Tencent, China)
  • 16.04 15:59
  • 1
The last of the Mohicans and the flying "Chinese": what disappoints the 6th generation of US aircraft
  • 16.04 15:54
  • 1
Названа способная повлиять на ход СВО российская разработка
  • 16.04 15:43
  • 1
Управляемый из Москвы FPV-дрон «Овод» поразил объект ВСУ в ДНР