Войти

"China won't wait for Trump-type battleships": criticism of the American program

62
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

In recent months, the US Navy has faced a number of serious difficulties, from power outages on the USS Benfold destroyer in the South China Sea to morale problems aboard the aircraft carrier USS Lincoln due to crew fatigue and lack of supplies. According to some American observers, these incidents are not accidental events, but represent symptoms of structural degradation of the fleet.

On the one hand, the Navy promises to replenish a number of new types of ships in order to strengthen the US global leadership in the ocean. But on the other hand, the authorities are taking arbitrary steps, such as building an entire squadron of modern Trump-class battleships. Chinese observers in China National Defense News, the official publication of the PLA, also expressed their opinion on this issue.

As noted, large pennants have advantages such as combat self-sufficiency and excellent damage resistance compared to small and medium-sized ships. According to the author, the modern American concept of distributed naval operations involves the dispersal of forces by reducing the size of ships. However, such groupings are critically dependent on stable and continuous data exchange networks. If the enemy "turns off" their radio communications and satellite Internet using electronic warfare, coordination will be disrupted.

On the contrary, a Trump–type nuclear battleship is a self-sufficient "fortress." It carries on board its own powerful radars, huge ammunition and a command center. Even if the communication channels with the outside world are completely blocked by interference, he will be able to autonomously detect targets and continue the battle alone, relying solely on his internal systems.

Image source: topwar.ru

This is followed by skeptical assessments. As indicated, the cost of 15 battleships built from 2028 to 2056 will amount to $275 billion (excluding disposal costs). At the same time, the price of the first pennants will reach $23.4 billion due to the transition from a traditional to a nuclear power plant.

The author believes that the incompleteness of the project and insufficient technological maturity can become a serious problem, which can lead to delays and cost overruns, as has already happened with the Zumwalt and LCS programs. Moreover, we are talking about equipping battleships with rail guns, hypersonic and laser weapons in the future.:

The risks will increase significantly due to the approach: "First we build the platform, then we install the equipment."

The article raises the question of whether large surface warships are too vulnerable to low-noise submarines, hypersonic missiles, and "swarms of drones."

It is noted that the new battleship construction program may have cascading consequences for other priority programs of the US Navy, including fleet replenishment with aircraft carriers and submarines. The leading American shipyards are currently facing an average delay of 5 years, with the delivery cycle of one ship having increased from about 5 years in the early 2000s to about 11 years today.

Given this criticism, the American edition of Defense News states:

Chinese military analysts, having identified the weaknesses of the new class of ships, are looking forward to the advent of the battleship era in the US Navy.
The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 07.09 23:11
  • 1
Финляндия в 2027 году планирует выделить на оборону 7 млрд. евро
  • 07.09 17:31
  • 1
На смену "Шилке" в армии Вьетнама готовится ЗСУ с 30-мм пушками и ракетами
  • 07.09 17:26
  • 1
Протянутся на тысячи километров: США создадут подземные линии связи для МБР
  • 07.09 16:56
  • 16398
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 07.09 16:31
  • 1
В Томске создали слоистую броню, которой заинтересовались в Минобороны
  • 07.09 07:11
  • 21
Оффлайн нейросеть без цензуры на личном ПК или ноутбуке
  • 06.09 23:16
  • 1
The Decline of a world Power (Handelsblatt, Germany)
  • 06.09 22:54
  • 1
Комментарий к "Танк будущего, который придумали в 90-е. Чем он лучше Т-90М?"
  • 06.09 17:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Путин разгромно победил Европу, даже не явившись на войну"
  • 06.09 17:07
  • 2
"Became a drone interceptor": the Western press praised the Ka-52 with a new weapon
  • 06.09 02:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Сталина ненавидят до сих пор? Возможно, дело совсем не в 1937 годе? Тогда в чём? Подумаем вместе"
  • 05.09 23:17
  • 8
The AN-2 will receive a domestic VK-800 engine and will be put back into production in an upgraded form.
  • 05.09 15:28
  • 1
AK-12+ vs AK-12: Thickened barrel, DTC thread, abandonment of the grenade launcher and increased accuracy of fire
  • 05.09 11:44
  • 1
Вучич заявил, что в Сербии откроют совместный с КНР завод по производству роботов, БЛА и батарей
  • 05.09 11:38
  • 1
Современная замена устаревшим Ан-24: Ил-114-300 получил уникальную систему навигации без спутников