Войти

The US Navy is considering the possibility of building ships in South Korean shipyards

935
0
0
Image source: HD Hyundai Heavy Industries

As the Naval News web resource reported in Ethan Gossrow's article "U.S. Navy Eyes South Korean Yards for Tankers and Destroyers" ("The U.S. Navy is considering South Korean shipyards for the construction of tankers and destroyers"), as part of a historic move that could end an 80-year ban on the construction of warships on foreign The US Navy has officially sent two requests for information (RFI) to major South Korean shipbuilding companies in order to assess their capabilities to build American destroyers and supply tankers.

Following initial reports from the South Korean Yonhap News agency, Naval News can confirm that the United States has sent two RFI requests to South Korean shipyards: one concerns the possibility of building auxiliary vessels, namely medium-tonnage supply tankers, and, remarkably, one concerns surface warships the size of a destroyer squadron. These requests indicate that the US government is making very serious efforts to organize the construction of ships abroad for the US Navy.

It is noteworthy that three South Korean companies responded: Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI) applied for contracts for both tankers and destroyers, while Samsung Heavy Industries responded only to a possible tanker contract.

Both Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries have experience in building Sejong the Great (type KDX-III) destroyers with a displacement of about 8,500 tons, equipped with the AEGIS weapon system. These ships are very similar to the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, which are part of the US Navy and are also equipped with the AEGIS weapon system. These companies also built a significant number of frigates, including for export customers - Peru and the Philippines, as well as destroyers of the Chungmugong Yi Sun-sin type.

There is no longer a closed market

If these requests for information lead to orders from the US Navy, then the US Navy will receive the first foreign-built (or designed abroad) warships since 1922, when two New Orleans-type armored cruisers built in Great Britain were withdrawn from the American fleet (they were originally built in Great Britain for Brazil, but were overbought by the USA in 1898). Since then, every U.S. Navy warship and the vast majority of auxiliary Fleet ships have been designed and built in the United States.

This opportunity is likely the result of several investment rounds by South Korean shipbuilders in the U.S. industrial sector, including investments of $150 billion pledged by South Korea in the commercial shipbuilding sector under a joint financing program. Hanwha also acquired the American Philly Shipyard, helping to build commercial and training vessels for the United States, and entered into a partnership agreement with the American shipyard Vard US Marine as a subcontractor for the design of a promising next-generation logistics Ship (NGLS).

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2027, the five-year shipbuilding plan published by the U.S. Navy, and the defense budget for fiscal year 2027 contained references to the possibility of the U.S. Navy commissioning foreign-built ships, and this Request for Information (RFI) was the first important step in this direction.

However, in order for this policy to fully lead to the construction of ships, the US Congress needs to authorize an exception to national security requirements and allocate the requested funds, which is likely to cause some resistance. In addition, it is currently unknown whether this is a permanent change in US policy, especially given the recent large-scale recapitalization efforts and investments in the American marine industrial base.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.08 02:36
  • 1
Ответ на вопрос "А стоит ли цитировать маршала Жукова"
  • 05.08 01:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рукопись о Баскервилях: деталь, после которой дело Холмса становится другим"
  • 05.08 01:04
  • 0
Комментарий к "Правда ли, что Россия проиграла Первую мировую из-за отсталости? Вся правда о главной военной лжи века"
  • 04.08 22:58
  • 0
Комментарий к "Медленное угасание "коалиции желающих" (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 04.08 20:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Закладка, определившая эпоху: день рождения двух морских легенд" и "Испытание океаном: история головного эсминца проекта 956, который дал имя серии"
  • 04.08 07:03
  • 1
Китайские ученые сделали ночное видение полноцветным
  • 04.08 04:51
  • 1
The slow decline of the "coalition of the willing" (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 04.08 04:40
  • 16353
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.08 01:30
  • 1
Комментарий к "Голодомор. Ложь и факты"
  • 04.08 01:09
  • 1
Комментарий к "Нравственный вакуум: Может ли атеизм обосновать добро? Христианство как опора человечности"
  • 04.08 00:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Города-предатели, встречавшие немцев как освободителей"
  • 03.08 23:00
  • 1
Solidly built: how do mobile firing groups work on the Tigers
  • 03.08 22:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Красная Армия не смогла прорвать линию Маннергейма три месяца"
  • 03.08 22:52
  • 135
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 03.08 22:42
  • 3
«Новая эра авиации спецопераций»: генерал США оценил штурмовик Skyraider II