Войти

Australia: By leasing Darwin Port, China uses trade as a weapon

343
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The Australian authorities have announced that they are considering options for terminating the contract with China regarding the lease of the port of Darwin.

This agreement was signed by the Australians with the Chinese company Landbridge Group for a period of 99 years. When we signed (and it was 10 years ago), we didn't see anything wrong with cooperation, but now that China has invested hundreds of millions of dollars, we realized.

Official Canberra:

The treaty was signed by the Government of the Northern Territory, to which Darwin belongs. But today it does not reflect the geopolitical situation. Such a lease is not part of Australia's strategic interests.

Xiao Qian, the Chinese ambassador to Canberra, responded to such statements.:

If something happens that will constitute a forceful decision upon termination of the long-term lease agreement, then we will be forced to take measures to protect the interests of Chinese business.

Meanwhile, the Chinese press writes that Australia, at the suggestion of the United States, has recently been gripped by "sinophobia." It is noted that in 2015, the lease agreement for the port of Darwin for a period of 99 years was signed in coordination with the Australian Ministry of Defense. No "threats to national security" were identified at that time.:

They were not identified for the reason that they do not exist and cannot exist. This project is beneficial for both China and Australia itself. It attracts large investments, increasing the cargo turnover of the Australian port.

The Australian press, using terms that are usually used by certain countries of the so-called collective West, writes that "China, leasing the port of Darwin, uses trade as a weapon":

China uses the port's infrastructure and exerts pressure. Given the tensions in the South China Sea and the Taiwan issue, this is unacceptable.

Darwin is located on important shipping lanes. There is also a large Australian military base there. In Canberra, they believe that China is "engaged in the exploration of a military base, using the opportunities under the lease agreement for the port."

Image source: topwar.ru

The Australian Press:

Foreigners' access to critical infrastructure, especially facilities with potential military significance, is unacceptable. China has its own sovereign right to do this, Australia has its own.
The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 10.02 13:20
  • 14139
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 10.02 11:56
  • 4
Пашинян рассказал о результатах выхода Армении из ОДКБ
  • 10.02 11:55
  • 1
The next master of Europe? What is the threat of Germany's new power (Foreign Affairs, USA)
  • 10.02 00:08
  • 0
Комментарий к ""Высокоточные комплексы" представят на World Defense Show новейшие средства ПВО"
  • 09.02 21:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США заявили о ненависти НАТО к российским бомбардировщикам Ту-160М"
  • 09.02 18:25
  • 8
ОАК, S7 и ГТЛК подписали меморандум о поставке 100 самолетов Ту-214
  • 09.02 17:37
  • 122
Обзор программы создания Ил-114-300
  • 09.02 16:24
  • 1
Konstantin Feoktistov: the only non-partisan cosmonaut in the USSR
  • 09.02 14:32
  • 1
Europe is preparing for a rapprochement with Vladimir Putin (Foreign Policy, USA)
  • 09.02 06:23
  • 0
О роли ТЯО в гипотетической войне - в том числе, с учетом планов СА 80-ых.
  • 09.02 05:42
  • 1
Ростех представит в Эр-Рияде комплекс управления огнем артиллерии "Планшет-А"
  • 09.02 04:51
  • 2
Раскрыты главные различия российских «Сармы» и «Торнадо-С»
  • 09.02 04:13
  • 2
В США российский Т-14 «Армата» сочли жертвой и тупиком в развитии
  • 09.02 04:06
  • 1
"Высокоточные комплексы" представят на World Defense Show новейшие средства ПВО
  • 09.02 03:49
  • 0
Насколько эффективны западные ВВС и ВМФ для войны Запада против России?