Войти

Knocking down the purchase of Chinese fighter jets: The United States approved the sale of missiles to Egypt

1570
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

AIM-120D-3

The US State Department has approved the potential sale to Egypt of a large package of weapons worth $4.67 billion – NASAMS medium-range air defense systems, 4 AN/MPQ-64F1 Sentinel ground-based radars and under a thousand missiles: 100 extended-range AMRAAM-ER (land-based) and URVV (which can also be used with NASAMS air defense systems) – 100 AIM-120C-8 AMRAAM, 600 AIM-9X Sidewinder Block II and 150 training AIM-9X CATM.

According to the US authorities, this deal will help maintain the security of an ally that is seen as a stabilizing factor in the Middle East. However, in fact, these sales are aimed at ousting China from the Egyptian market, which began supplying military products due to Washington's long-term refusal of full-fledged military-technical cooperation with Cairo due to "human rights violations."

The United States does not intend to give China complete freedom of action in Egypt, a country located near the strategically important Suez Canal.

- it is said in the Western press.

Image source: topwar.ru

NASAMS

As previously mentioned, in early July, the Egyptian military confirmed the presence of Chinese HQ-9B/FD-2000B air defense systems based on the Soviet S-300 complex. Moreover, statements were made about the possibility of expanding military-technical cooperation with Beijing, up to the purchase of J-10C or J-31 fighters.

As explained by the local military, they are forced to take this step by the actual US arms embargo, which, in particular, does not sell missiles for the F-16 fleet, which has over 200 aircraft and is the basis of the Egyptian Air Force. And without modern explosive devices and other ammunition, the combat value of this fleet of fighters, forced to make do with outdated AIM-7 Sparrow, drops significantly.

Thus, the US decision to sell a large batch of air defense systems and missiles is actually aimed at knocking down the purchase of military products from China, primarily fighter jets.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.08 20:46
  • 0
Комментарий к "Танк Т-64 с автоматом заряжания убрал четвёртого члена экипажа — что это изменило в конструкции"
  • 01.08 19:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему гуманитарию так сложно найти общий язык с техническими специалистами? Я одна такая? Есть ли вообще решение?"
  • 01.08 18:25
  • 16349
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.08 06:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "Так какую же всё-таки роль сыграл Ленд-лиз"
  • 01.08 02:20
  • 0
Об эсминцах, раз уж пошел разговор о возобновлении их постройки в РФ
  • 01.08 00:27
  • 0
Комментарий к "Один стационарный С-200 закрывал площадь сорока дивизионов С-75"
  • 31.07 19:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ"
  • 31.07 19:02
  • 2
Russia has announced its first destroyer program in 40 years. Urgently needed: Ocean-going warships (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
  • 31.07 18:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Россия объявила о первой за 40 лет программе создания эсминцев. Срочно требуются: океанские боевые корабли (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 31.07 18:09
  • 1
Госкомвоенпром: ОАО "АЛЕВКУРП" усовершенствовало оптико-электронную систему для ЗРК
  • 31.07 18:00
  • 1
Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ
  • 31.07 17:37
  • 1
Sea revenues: The Caspian Flotilla acquired its own aircraft
  • 31.07 17:18
  • 1
Минобороны: Россия обладает опытом создания масштабных группировок ПВО
  • 31.07 07:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чем же была более всего сильна промышленность Российской империи"
  • 31.07 05:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чего Европе ждать от задуманной США “НАТО 3.0”? (The Spectator, Великобритания)"