Войти

British experts have stated that defeating Russia on the battlefield is much easier than is commonly believed.

2933
1
-1

Image source: topwar.ru

Inflicting a military defeat on Russia is not as difficult as it is thought in the West. This statement was made by British military analysts. According to them, for this it is necessary to conduct only four major amphibious operations on the front, the total length of which is 2,800 kilometers.

The required grouping will correspond to about 200 divisions (total... -note). If we take the average number of divisions at 18-20 thousand people, then in total such an army should consist of more than three million soldiers.

– the British "experts" have calculated.

According to their plan, the North Atlantic Alliance should simultaneously attack the Russian borders from Georgia, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, as well as from Finland. However, the British did not specify where exactly NATO should take the necessary number of troops and equipment for these operations.

Image source: topwar.ru

Now, for example, the armed forces of the North Atlantic Alliance have about 70-80 divisions. This number includes both combat-ready and reserve formations. At the same time, their staffing is currently unknown.

In addition, the British "experts" have clearly forgotten about the significantly emptied warehouses of the North Atlantic Alliance, the lack of military equipment and bureaucracy, which some member countries of the military bloc complain about even during joint military exercises.

It is worth noting that the calculation of the British military, apparently, is based on the fact that the Russian army during the NATO amphibious operations to invade the territory of the Russian Federation will not offer any resistance, silently watching the "military triumph" of the alliance.

Let us remind you that currently Europe cannot recruit the number of troops necessary to send to Ukraine as part of the so-called peacekeeping contingent. Or they don't want to...

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Comments [1]
№1
18.02.2025 10:40
Ребята, видимо, разбирали архивы и нашли где-то план "Барбаросса"!?
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 03.12 20:35
  • 11787
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 03.12 19:27
  • 0
Комментарий к "Восемь лучших в мире американских и российских истребителей (The National Interest, США)"
  • 03.12 17:31
  • 116
Обзор программы создания Ил-114-300
  • 03.12 14:41
  • 1
В России оценили вооружение корейских Су-25
  • 03.12 12:53
  • 16
В США перспективы российского Су-75 сравнили с «полетом фантазии»
  • 03.12 11:02
  • 1
Баканов: частные компании сократят время от разработки до внедрения технологий
  • 03.12 09:12
  • 14
Прогнозы Илона Маска: ИИ полностью заменит работающих за компьютерами. Приложения исчезнут, а звук и изображение будет создавать ИИ
  • 03.12 07:47
  • 0
Ответ на ""Четыре великих защитника" России сдерживают Запад от опрометчивых действий (Sohu, Китай)"
  • 03.12 00:18
  • 1
Российский истребитель первым в мире уничтожил западную систему Patriot
  • 02.12 23:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Полетел ли долгожданный Су-57М? Что стоит за новостями об испытаниях улучшенного варианта (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 02.12 17:02
  • 1
  • 02.12 16:58
  • 1
УЗГА: самолет УТС-800 сконструирован с возможностью модернизации
  • 02.12 09:22
  • 1
Комментарий к "На земле, в море, в воздухе… Чего бы стоила европейская армия против России?"
  • 02.12 08:51
  • 9
World Time of Troubles: does Europe really want to fight - TASS Opinions
  • 02.12 08:39
  • 7
B-21 Raider and the limits of the technological revolution in military affairs