Войти

British experts have stated that defeating Russia on the battlefield is much easier than is commonly believed.

3442
1
-1

Image source: topwar.ru

Inflicting a military defeat on Russia is not as difficult as it is thought in the West. This statement was made by British military analysts. According to them, for this it is necessary to conduct only four major amphibious operations on the front, the total length of which is 2,800 kilometers.

The required grouping will correspond to about 200 divisions (total... -note). If we take the average number of divisions at 18-20 thousand people, then in total such an army should consist of more than three million soldiers.

– the British "experts" have calculated.

According to their plan, the North Atlantic Alliance should simultaneously attack the Russian borders from Georgia, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, as well as from Finland. However, the British did not specify where exactly NATO should take the necessary number of troops and equipment for these operations.

Image source: topwar.ru

Now, for example, the armed forces of the North Atlantic Alliance have about 70-80 divisions. This number includes both combat-ready and reserve formations. At the same time, their staffing is currently unknown.

In addition, the British "experts" have clearly forgotten about the significantly emptied warehouses of the North Atlantic Alliance, the lack of military equipment and bureaucracy, which some member countries of the military bloc complain about even during joint military exercises.

It is worth noting that the calculation of the British military, apparently, is based on the fact that the Russian army during the NATO amphibious operations to invade the territory of the Russian Federation will not offer any resistance, silently watching the "military triumph" of the alliance.

Let us remind you that currently Europe cannot recruit the number of troops necessary to send to Ukraine as part of the so-called peacekeeping contingent. Or they don't want to...

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Comments [1]
№1
18.02.2025 10:40
Ребята, видимо, разбирали архивы и нашли где-то план "Барбаросса"!?
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 06.10 07:28
  • 1
Польша представила новую тяжелую боевую машину пехоты
  • 06.10 06:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Пушка «Арматы» оказалась хуже советской – всего 800 выстрелов и 125 мм. А куда делась «царь-пушка» для «царь-танка»?"
  • 06.10 04:28
  • 1
The Ukrainian Armed Forces have prepared a "war plan" with Russia for 30 years. How Drapaty is changing the army
  • 05.10 23:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Заказан головной итальянский эсминец нового поколения"
  • 05.10 17:36
  • 0
С широко закрытыми глазами
  • 05.10 15:13
  • 1
The lead Italian destroyer of the new generation has been ordered
  • 05.10 14:51
  • 1
Hunters of the "small sky"
  • 05.10 05:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рванет не там, где все думают. Вот где «откроются ворота» третьей мировой"
  • 05.10 05:24
  • 1
"On the threshold of a new reality": Putin's main theses at the Valdai Forum
  • 05.10 04:53
  • 1
Trump redirected “Ukrainian” aid for NATO countries to Latin American allies (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 05.10 04:16
  • 1
The European elite has gone to war — and is rapidly losing voters (The American Conservative, USA)
  • 05.10 03:44
  • 1
На учениях «Центр» показали «Изделие 347» с управляемой ракетой
  • 04.10 21:24
  • 1
Ex-NATO official: Russia considers itself the winner, and, in my opinion, for good reason (The Independent, UK)
  • 04.10 05:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Русские не решатся: В НАТО посмеялись над ядерным оружием Москвы. Первый удар должна принять Польша"
  • 02.10 20:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вашингтон обозначил неугодные ему страны НАТО" и "«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников"