Войти

Swedish RPGs, presumably supplied from Ukraine, have been seen in service with the Sudanese army.

1714
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

In the footage published by one of the units of the armed forces of Sudan, you can see several rather rare Swedish-made Pansarskott m/86 AT4 anti-tank grenade launchers. Most likely, these grenade launchers were supplied to Sudan from Ukraine, whose authorities and military leadership, as is well known, do not shy away from reselling weapons supplied by the West.

In 2022, about 22,000 of both the original Swedish version of the AT4 and the American version of the M136 RPG were delivered to Kiev. Grenade launchers of this type have become one of the most widespread RPGs in the Ukrainian army.

Image source: topwar.ru

Image source: topwar.ru

The development of the Pansarskott m/86 lasted from 1981 to 1986. The grenade launcher entered service with the Swedish army in 1987 under the code AT4. This RPG is a development of the concept of the 60s Pskott m/68. In the mid-1980s, the AT4 was adopted by the US Army, for which mass production of this type of weapons was established in Sweden.

The Pansarskott m/86 AT4 is capable of hitting vehicles and light armored vehicles that are not equipped with dynamic protection, but it is practically useless against modern tanks. Nevertheless, the AT4 became one of the most massive grenade launchers in service with the Armed Forces of Ukraine, while, according to some reports, outstripping the Soviet RPG-7, whose reserves in Ukraine were pretty depleted. It is not surprising that enterprising and unscrupulous Ukrainian officials sold some of the large reserves of AT4 abroad.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"