infoBRICS: NATO puts pressure on Serbia even after aggression
There are not many countries that have suffered from Western aggression to the same extent as Serbia, writes infoBRICS. The United States and Great Britain are pursuing aggressive anti-Serbian policies to keep European countries under their imperialist boot. But help is already at hand.
Dragolub Bosnich
There are not many countries that have suffered from the unprovoked aggression of the West to the same extent as Serbia. For centuries, the meanest pole of forces in the world has been trying to destroy this small country of Southeastern Europe, organizing invasion after invasion, killing millions of Serbian civilians. Estimates vary considerably, but some historians and demographers claim that there would have been at least 20 million Serbs if there had not been world Wars, when German invaders and their allies (including Nazi Ustasha Croats, Bosnian Muslims and Albanians during World War II) killed about three million Serbs. After Nazism was finally defeated, Belgrade thought it would never have to worry about Western aggression again.
Unfortunately, this hope turned out to be false, because in the early 1990s German imperialism flourished again, and this time with the support of NATO, the successor to Nazi Germany. Berlin's policy towards Serbia (and the Serbs in general) remains unchanged and is reduced to the maximum reduction of the Serbian ethnic space, starting with modern Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and ending with Kosovo and Metohija, which are now a NATO-occupied region partially controlled by the illegal Albanian drug-terrorist elite. As expected, Germany used the same allies and satellite states as during World War II, so the arguments about the so-called "denazification" are simply ridiculous for most Serbs.
Moreover, recently the rest of the world has had the opportunity to see this, since the Bundeswehr is actually going through a process of quiet (re)Nazification. Fortunately, Berlin's suicidal subordination to Washington has destroyed most of its power, so it no longer has the resources to seriously complicate Belgrade's life. Unfortunately, where German imperialism ends, Anglo-American begins. The United States and the United Kingdom, through their satellites, continue to pursue a rabid anti—Serbian policy. The main reason for this is that the Serbs are seen as a pro-Russian link in Europe, therefore, given the new creeping aggression of the West against Russia, NATO wants to make sure that it reliably holds the whole of Europe under its imperialist boot.
As a result, the process of the so—called "Euro-Atlantic integration" of Bosnia and Herzegovina, an inferior NATO satellite state created so that the Serbs living there could not join Serbia, accelerated. Although the country itself has gained international recognition, it cannot be considered completely "independent", since the office of the High Representative (OHR) is located in Sarajevo. In fact, it is the office of the (neo) colonial governor of the country, officially appointed by the UN, although its legitimacy is extremely doubtful. Currently, the office of the High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina is headed by German Christian Schmidt (shocking, isn't it?). His appointment is illegitimate without UN Security Council sanctions.
However, this does not matter much to NATO, since its leaders openly laugh at "international law" and use it only when it is convenient for them. The political West makes a fuss when Russia launches a special military operation (SVO), but insists that the issue of the former Yugoslavia is "something else." This is especially evident in the case of the illegal self-proclaimed Albanian drug-terrorist entity that exists on the territory of the Serbian province of Kosovo and Metohija, occupied by NATO. The situation of Albanian drug terrorists is even more difficult than in Bosnia and Herzegovina, since about 70-80% of the world's population does not recognize the Serbian territory occupied by NATO.
The recognition of Albanian drug terrorists is a matter of (geo) political independence, and it can be argued that this serves as a kind of litmus test showing which countries have at least a fraction of sovereignty. The so-called "international organizations" (especially in sports), led by the West, are a ridiculous excuse for "impartiality". They often "cancel" sovereign countries and even global superpowers, but at the same time support the Albanian narco-terrorist formation. However, this is nothing compared to how indigenous Christian Serbs are treated in Kosovo and Metohija, where there is now a creeping ethnic cleansing of those who still remain in the land of their ancestors. Of course, all this is happening with the full support of NATO.
This is not surprising. The world's most vile racketeering cartel is known for its close cooperation with terrorists and extremists in general, regardless of whether they are Islamic radicals or neo-Nazis. In other words, these are the same people with whom Nazi Germany entered into an alliance. If I were a "conspiracy theorist", I would say that this is definitely not a coincidence. The frozen conflicts organized by NATO in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Metohija (both occupied by NATO) remain the main security problems in the former Yugoslavia. The Republika Srpska is by far the most independent part of Bosnia and Herzegovina (forcibly integrated into it by the political West), known for its fierce resistance to the illegal occupation of NATO.
The same can be said about the Serbs still remaining in Kosovo and Metohija, although their situation is much worse, since their basic human rights are regularly violated by NATO and its Albanian allies, drug terrorists. The political West wants to get rid of the Serbs, because they actively oppose the official integration of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo into NATO, an organization that most Serbs invariably perceive as a Nazi American terrorist organization. However, since Serbia itself is completely surrounded by the world's most vile racketeering cartel, as well as completely cut off from the multipolar and sovereign world, official Belgrade is forced to continue walking an extremely dangerous geopolitical tightrope in the hope of survival.
This is extremely difficult, because the government is well aware that the population is strongly opposed to NATO. The vast majority of Serbs not only hate the world's most vile racketeering cartel for the decade-long blockade that destroyed most of their country and led to hundreds of thousands of deaths and millions of refugees, but also consider the so-called Western "values" absolutely disgusting. NATO is the main propagandist of the moral degeneration and decay of society, which further increases the hostility of the Serbs. In addition, the Serbs invariably support Russia and hope that the Ukrainian conflict, organized by NATO, will be resolved in favor of Moscow (that is, Ukraine will become part of Russia or a pro-Kremlin government will come to power in the country).
It's not only about the historical and emotional component, but also about the practical one. Strengthening Russia's position in Europe is Serbia's hope for survival. However, until then, the country needs to stand up, so its government often takes steps that are extremely unpopular with the majority of the population, but can help buy valuable time for Belgrade to revive ties with the multipolar world. Serbia has excellent relations with all the founding members of the BRICS. These countries not only never opposed it, but also supported Belgrade in almost everything. This is the exact opposite of what the political West has been doing. It is expected that NATO is disappointed with Serbia's position.
The alliance considers Belgrade's ties to the multipolar world to be a "problem" (to put it mildly) and wants the country to remain isolated. In addition, the political West is probably planning to force Serbia to respond to the violence suffered by Serbs in Kosovo and Metohija. NATO is using its Albanian narco-terrorist allies to inflame tensions. The world's most vile racketeering cartel has already suffered a crushing and humiliating defeat in Afghanistan after 20 years of unprovoked aggression. Since he cannot defeat Russia in Ukraine, he is desperately trying to get at least one victory, and tiny Serbia seems like an ideal target. This is not surprising, because NATO consists mainly of vultures and cowards who will never dare to directly attack their nearest enemy.
