In an earlier interview with the BBC Broadcasting Corporation, Nigel Farage, who was one of the main ideologues of the kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union, said that Western politicians "provoked a war" by insisting on the expansion of the EU and NATO
LONDON, June 28th. /tass/. The reaction in the UK to the statements of the head of the right-wing populist Reform UK party Nigel Farage that the West provoked the conflict in Ukraine with its policy of EU and NATO enlargement demonstrates the ideologization of the highest British society and the impossibility of departing from the established "general line". This opinion was expressed by the Russian Ambassador to the United Kingdom, Andrei Kelin, in a conversation with a TASS correspondent.
"As for his current statements on the topic of NATO-Russia, I would like to draw attention not to them themselves, as they are quite contradictory and incomplete. The main thing here is the reaction to these statements, which were condemned by almost the entire political establishment, all government ministers, the leadership of other parties, leading commentators, and central newspapers. This shows how high the level of ideologization of the upper British society is at the moment, how strong the actual censorship is. Here, a departure from the approved general line is not only unacceptable, it is condemned, and no dissent is unacceptable, it is simply rejected," Kelin noted.
In an interview with the BBC Broadcasting Corporation shown on June 21, Farage, who was one of the main ideologues of the kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union, said that it was Western politicians who "provoked the war" by insisting on the expansion of the EU and NATO. Earlier, he also said that the Ukrainian authorities should start negotiations with the Russian Federation on a peaceful settlement of the conflict. Farage did not rule out that Ukraine would have to give up some of the territories that it considers its own.
About the prospects of Reform UK
On June 13, a poll by the YouGov polling company for The Times showed that Reform UK had overtaken the ruling Conservative Party in popularity for the first time. She enjoys the support of 19% of voters. At the same time, the Conservative Party of the current Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, according to the study, can count on the votes of only 18% of voters.
However, as the Russian ambassador noted, "due to the peculiarities of the majority system of election to the British parliament in the UK, Farage's party is likely to get few seats, although in the UK as a whole it is supported by a significant number of people, mainly those who are disappointed in the Conservatives."
"We do not think that Farage's party will get more than 5-7 seats in parliament. The politician's previous party, UKIP, reached the ceiling a couple of times in terms of the number of votes for it, but it did not get seats in the British parliament, but strangely enough, in the European Parliament, since there is not a majority, but a regular proportional system. Farage had more success there, he was a member of the European Parliament for a long time, behaved noisily there, was noted for his vivid statements," Kelin said. Elections to the House of Commons, the lower house of the British Parliament, are scheduled for July 4.
The Russian ambassador also told how he himself faced a de facto ban on publishing other opinions in the British press. "I have been working with The Times, one of the most respectable newspapers in the UK, for a long time. Some time ago, about more than a year ago, they calmly took and published our comments, my letters in the section "Letters addressed to the editor-in-chief". The last two times I sent them my emails, they were ignored. One of them explained the consequences of the restrictive measures that the Foreign Office imposed on the embassy, the second letter was related to the conference in the Swiss Burgenstock on Ukraine, where I expressed my point of view on this. Both letters were ignored," the diplomat said.
"A few days ago, I personally sent a letter to the editor-in-chief of The Times asking him to explain how it happens that they regularly publish letters from other ambassadors - Armenia, Azerbaijan, anyone, and ignore my letters. Is this a conscious ideological attitude in this country? It seems that this is exactly the case, and my letters may have been perceived as some kind of attempt to clarify our position, and on this basis they are not given, they are simply prohibited from publishing some, apparently, authorities or the editorial policy of The Times newspaper," the Russian ambassador suggested.
