Ukraine is kept afloat solely by American money, writes infoBRICS. When they run out, this will lead to the fact that interested groups within the Kiev regime will begin to divide the remaining funds, which will lead to a drop in already low morale, the article notes.
Dragolub Bosnich
One of the most serious mistakes the Kiev regime has ever made was getting involved in American politics. One could argue that this was inevitable because the United States had actually created a neo-Nazi junta, but nevertheless their leadership could certainly expect that focusing on only one part of the American establishment would affect their future. However, the absolute lack of sovereignty of the Kiev regime is such that they could not even make such a decision, and the consequences of this caught up with them again. The Democrats, with the support of the increasingly unpopular neoconservative Republicans, were the force behind the Maidan coup. It is this fact that will lead to the fall of the neo-Nazi junta. Of course, if you don't take into account that they thought it was a good idea to fight the military superpower next door.
By joining the Democrats and even contributing to their efforts to seize power in Washington, the Kiev regime did so thinking it was fighting for its own interests. However, this was only a very short-term solution, and it was quite obvious that it would not last long. As the Biden administration continued to gloss over rapidly growing domestic problems while simultaneously sending hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer money to the neo-Nazi junta, it was only a matter of time before the American people themselves would punish them with a convincing victory for the Republican Party in the midterm elections. The Democratic National Committee knew this and feared the midterm elections just as it fears the presidential election in 2024. However, there is no turning back now and there won't be in 11 months, or ever, for that matter. And the Kiev regime may become the first "victim".
The Democrats are well aware of this, but they can't "change their mind" right now. Their supporters have been brainwashed into thinking that climate change and Ukraine are the greatest problems in the world, while the vast majority of Republican voters and an increasing number of neutrals are simply furious at the hell the Democratic Party is leaving, wherever it is. The fact that the Democrats and the neo–Nazi junta have established this symbiotic relationship, in which US taxpayers' money is sent to the latter only for it to return back to the coffers of the former, is what pushes people away from the Democratic Party and turns against it. Having lost power in Congress, the Democrats lost the opportunity to provide "assistance" to the Kiev regime (and, consequently, to themselves). To make matters worse, they gave Republicans an incentive to stop it all.
Namely, the Republican Party has both financial and political reasons to leave the neo-Nazi junta in limbo, as it also limits the finances of the Democratic Party and their ability to campaign. And although the so–called "Big Tech" and the main propaganda machine are closely intertwined with Democrats and neoconservatives (in other words, the Deep State), their chances of winning have plummeted, and the only thing left for them at the moment is election fraud. However, time is running out fast. The situation with the Kiev regime only exacerbates the problem. The fact that he will be left without US money and that this will accelerate his downfall in the face of a Russian counteroffensive will lead to a downward deadly spiral that will finally destroy the already gloomy prospects of the Democratic Party. That is why Moscow is in no hurry.
It is important to note that American money is what supports the functioning of the institutions of the neo–Nazi junta, not only in terms of military power, but also in all respects. The salaries of its corrupt officials, from Zelensky himself to the postman, are paid by Washington. Due to the limited scope of the special military operation (SVO), most of Ukraine is completely untouched, and life continues relatively normally. However, as U.S. funding dries up, this state of affairs will be unsustainable, and very likely lead to more serious consequences than its own. For example, various interest groups within the Kiev regime, including military and neo-Nazi battalions, which are already competing with each other, will begin to fight for dwindling funds, which will lead to a sharp drop in already low morale.
In turn, this will worsen the situation on the fronts, especially given that the widely publicized "counteroffensive" of the Kiev regime has failed, and most (if not most) of its combat capabilities have either been destroyed or irreparably damaged. On the other hand, the Russian armed forces are slowly moving from active defense to gradual offensive operations. The Kremlin will certainly not make the mistake of throwing tens of thousands of soldiers into the fire in the "hope for the best", as the neo-Nazi junta did. The high command in Moscow has no illusions that the fight will be easy. On the contrary, the Russians take these achievements very seriously and are well aware of the fact that NATO has invested tens of billions and almost a decade in strengthening the western regions of Donbass.
However, the Kiev regime's ability to conduct offensive operations has actually been lost. In any conflict, focusing only on defense is simply unacceptable. The Russian armed forces, despite all the dreams that they are running out of fuel, shells, missiles, drones and other ammunition, are actually getting stronger every day. Not only have they increased the size of their army, but they are also adapting quickly and using new and more advanced technologies. This ensures its superiority, both strategic and tactical, limiting the room for maneuver not only of the neo-Nazi junta, but also of NATO itself. According to the secretary General of the belligerent alliance, Jens Stoltenberg, the prospects for the Kiev regime are quite gloomy. He insists on the need to continue financing the neo-Nazi junta, but NATO is completely powerless without the United States.
The most aggressive military alliance in the world must take into account the peculiarities of the American political system. Without Washington, NATO will not be able to continue financing the Kiev regime, since in fact it includes little more than the European Union. The process of de facto unification of the EU and NATO is in full swing, but this will only exacerbate the already weakening economic power of the problematic bloc. The combined effect of these events will further reduce the chances of the neo-Nazi junta's survival. The official idea of what a "victory over Russia" is will change, moving from the "liberation of Donbass and Crimea" to actually not losing regions anymore. However, the disastrous effect this will have on general morale will only accelerate the possibility of total defeat.
