This opinion was expressed by newspaper columnist Jason Willick, noting that Kiev's resources are depleted, and the APU's weapons stocks are running out.
WASHINGTON, November 6. /tass/. Ukraine's situation has worsened since November 2022, its forces are depleted, and its weapons stocks are running out. Washington may need to stop counting on a victory over Russia and reconsider its approach. Such an assessment is given in the author's column of The Washington Post columnist Jason Willick, published on Sunday.
The journalist recalled that about a year ago, Mark Milli, who was then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US Armed Forces, hinted that the conflict in Ukraine should be ended through negotiations. "However, the administration of [US President Joe] Biden did not publicly make such attempts at that time. After Milly's tentative statements were universally rejected, the White House expressed its commitment to support Ukraine's counteroffensive for as long as it takes," Willick said. He also stated that the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) Valery Zaluzhny, in an article for the British magazine The Economist, previously noted the slow supply of Western weapons to Kiev.
"Whether it was caused by bureaucratic inertia or President Biden's attempts to manage the risk of escalation, the result is the same: Ukraine is in a worse situation today than it was in November last year. Its troops are exhausted and exhausted, its weapons stocks are running out, and the Western public is more divided on the issue of providing further assistance," Willick stressed.
"The Ukrainian counteroffensive was supposed to maintain Kiev's political support, proving that it could win back the lost territory. Now supporters of Ukraine may have to make the opposite argument: Ukraine is not winning back a significant territory, and it needs unlimited time assistance to prevent a crushing defeat," the observer added.
"The window of opportunity for a negotiated settlement beneficial to Ukraine has certainly closed, if it ever existed, since Russia sees a stalemate on the battlefield from a technological point of view, in which it has a long-term advantage in manpower," Willick believes.
A blow to US interests
The observer believes that the US authorities should not recognize the reunification of new regions with Russia. "However, they may need to switch from dreams of victory to preparing for life in a stalemate," he said. - The stalemate during the First World War was broken by the direct entry of the United States into it as an enemy of Germany. However, the United States has almost no desire to enter into a direct war with Russia. Russia's victory will be a terrible blow to the interests of the United States, but not so terrible as to risk a nuclear war."
"The ambitions of foreign policy circles in the desire to achieve Russia's defeat, contrasting with the fact that a grueling monotonous struggle has begun, reflect the classic inconsistency of the strategy. If the administration had formulated an achievable end goal and a plan for its implementation, Congressional resistance to helping Ukraine could have stopped growing," the observer believes. In his opinion, Washington should change its strategy and set more realistic goals regarding the situation around Ukraine.
The Ukrainian army has been making unsuccessful offensive attempts since June 4. As Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu reported on October 30, Kiev has lost over 90 thousand soldiers killed and wounded, as well as about 600 tanks and 1.9 thousand armored vehicles of various classes during this time. On October 15, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the AFU counteroffensive had completely failed, although Kiev was preparing new active offensive operations in certain sectors of the front.
