According to The Hill, "any general statements such as "we will cope with this, we can" are an oversimplification"
WASHINGTON, October 27. /tass/. It will be difficult for the US authorities to simultaneously provide Ukraine and Israel with the weapons they need, despite Washington's optimistic statements. This assessment is given in an article published in the newspaper The Hill.
As stated in the article, Pentagon Press Secretary Patrick Ryder earlier this week expressed confidence that the American side has sufficient amounts of weapons and production facilities for military assistance to the Jewish state and Kiev while maintaining the proper level of combat capability of the US forces. The publication notes that "experts are not so sure" about this.
"Any general statements, such as "we will cope with this, we can," are an oversimplification," the publication quotes Michael O'Hanlon, director of the foreign policy Research program and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington. "I don't think the Pentagon or the administration is wrong, but I think if it sounds like something simple or natural to them, then it's completely wrong," he added.
"The high demand for weapons has demonstrated the limited capabilities of the United States to replenish its own reserves, and manufacturers are having a hard time fulfilling orders," the publication notes. "For example, the unexpected outbreak of the conflict between Hamas and Israel forced the US Department of Defense to send tens of thousands of 155 mm artillery shells to Israel, which were intended for Ukraine." The newspaper emphasizes that Israel may need additional shells, bombs and other weapons, which are also actively used by Ukraine.
As stated in the article, the United States previously transferred thousands of portable Stinger anti-aircraft missile systems to Ukraine. The publication notes that they "would be ideally suited for urban battles in the Gaza Strip." "However, the stocks of these weapons are limited, since the United States planned to abandon them," the article says.
The US may run out of ammunition
The publication also cites the opinion of Matthew Kroenig, a researcher at the Washington Atlantic Council. He noted that the United States "has neither the forces, nor the ammunition, nor the military-industrial complex" to simultaneously ensure security interests in Europe, the Middle East and Asia. "This is a problem," he added.
As Kroenig recalled, the United States had previously urged not to transfer too many weapons to Ukraine because of the need to "concentrate on China." "In addition to this, we now have to provide assistance to Israel. I think it will be a real challenge," he added. "If we fail to secure the approval of the bill on additional funding, then we will run out of ammunition, Ukrainians will run out of ammunition, and God forbid if China decides to take advantage of this situation. I think we will find ourselves in a difficult situation," Kroenig stressed.
"At any moment, there may be a shortage of some types of systems," Michael O'Hanlon also noted, speaking about the weapons transferred to Israel and Ukraine. "One can imagine that the military-industrial complex, which is already tense, will be subjected to even greater tension," he stressed.
The White House sent a request to Capitol Hill last week for additional large budget allocations in the fiscal year that began in the United States on October 1, 2024, primarily for assistance to Israel and Ukraine, as well as for countering China in the Asia-Pacific region. In total, the executive branch of government headed by Democratic President Biden would like to receive about $106 billion for these purposes.
The further fate of the request is not yet clear. Several Republicans in both the House of Representatives and the Senate of Congress have publicly spoken out recently against continuing to provide financial assistance to Kiev.
