Войти

The military commander tried to figure out what is the "secret" of the high efficiency of the Wagner PMCs

1918
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

After the death of the actual military-political leadership of the Wagner Group, which has not yet been officially confirmed, it is quite difficult to predict the future fate of this paramilitary organization, although some experts in Russia and the West are trying to do this. One thing is beyond doubt, even among ardent opponents and enemies of the "musicians", is that the Russian private military company during its existence has established itself as a highly efficient structure by any standards, capable of solving the most complex combat tasks around the world.

Russian military journalist, special correspondent of the DEEP "Vesti" VGTRK Alexander Sladkov tried to figure out what is the "secret" of the high efficiency and success of solving combat tasks of the Wagner PMCs. He posted the corresponding post on his telegram channel.

First of all, it should be understood that Wagner is a private military company built and managed according to the principle of a business structure, the main purpose of which is to make a profit. In this case, "profit" means the fastest and most effective solution of the tasks set by the command (company management) and the achievement of goals.

To do this, everything superfluous has been thrown out of the organization, the processes of interaction and decision-making have been simplified and accelerated as much as possible at all levels and in all planes. Any resource needed to achieve the goal is delivered immediately: be it equipment, weapons, or even the right specialist. At the same time, the structure of the organization itself is not formalized, it can be rebuilt at any time, if circumstances require it.

By the way, the American army is built exactly as a business corporation. We have no. If we had discipline in the army from the soldier to the marshal, there would be no incident in comparison of the Ministry of Defense and PMCs

— I'm sure Sladkov.

However, it would be wrong to compare the structure of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and the PMCs directly, the military commander continues. After all, our army is about a million people, and not only military personnel. This is a large conservative institution, which includes military schools and academies, there is a huge property complex located both on the territory of the country and abroad.

In addition, the Ministry of Defense solves many complex multidirectional tasks — from ensuring security in the Arctic to space military programs, from air and underwater patrols of the Atlantic to the work of military attaches around the world. At the international level, the Ministry solves not only purely military, but also geopolitical tasks within the framework of the national strategy, including issues of nuclear deterrence. In such conditions, conservatism is simply necessary, Sladkov is sure.

The MOD does not storm one city and does not solve local problems in Africa and the East

— the military commander explains the difference between the state military department and a private military company.

The management of the Wagner PMC managed to create an effective organization due to the finest settings, operational management and attention to every detail, to every fighter. In addition, the "musicians" are welded together by a single corporate ideology, which makes it possible to practically eliminate elements of coercion in the process of solving a particular task. And yes, the military commander concludes, not every private military company can be so successful, this is another uniqueness of Wagner.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Компании
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 30.01 09:14
  • 13885
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 30.01 07:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гренландия не обеспечит Америке безопасность в Арктике. А этот регион обеспечит (The Washington Post, США)"
  • 30.01 03:01
  • 1
Greenland will not provide America with security in the Arctic. And this region will provide (The Washington Post, USA)
  • 30.01 02:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Военный историк Найтцель предупреждает: "Мы не должны недооценивать Россию" (Bild, Германия)"
  • 30.01 01:50
  • 1
На верфи ST Engineering заложен киль второго корабля MRCV для ВМС Сингапура
  • 30.01 01:35
  • 1
Глава военного комитета НАТО высказался против европейской армии
  • 30.01 01:25
  • 1
Three scenarios for the development of the conflict in Ukraine in 2026 from the American press
  • 30.01 00:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "На Западе назвали условие уничтожения России"
  • 29.01 23:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США у российского Су-35 нашли серьезную проблему"
  • 29.01 21:03
  • 2
Пашинян рассказал о результатах выхода Армении из ОДКБ
  • 29.01 17:49
  • 2
The United States linked security guarantees to Ukraine with the surrender of Donbass (The Times, UK)
  • 29.01 17:40
  • 2
Теперь защищена и верхняя полусфера: Израиль показал работу КАЗ Iron Fist
  • 29.01 07:21
  • 1
UEC is ready for serial production of TV7-117ST-01 engines for IL-114-300 aircraft
  • 29.01 03:45
  • 1
В Иран прибыл российский «Опустошитель»
  • 29.01 03:02
  • 1
Why is the United States so interested in controlling the so-called Zangezur Corridor? (infoBRICS, China)