Войти

The German press blames the "Surovikin line" for the problems of the Ukrainian counteroffensive

1833
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The Western press continues to issue numerous materials from various experts with an attempt to analyze the course of the Ukrainian counteroffensive. Experts are trying to find an excuse for the fact that for almost two months of the "counteroffensive", the APU did not achieve even a tenth of the goals that were originally set. Recall that one of the goals was to cover Melitopol by June 18 at most, as well as further access to the borders of the Crimea and the Sea of Azov by the forces of three trained corps. Now at least two of these corps are already being unwound by Russian troops in the Zaporozhye and South Donetsk directions, units of the third corps are being transferred south of Artemovsk, where fierce battles are going on without ceasing.

The German T-Online concluded that the "Surovikin line" is to blame for the problems of the Ukrainian counteroffensive. Such a line in the West is called multi-kilometer engineering facilities, including mining strips, lines of so-called dragon teeth, anti-tank ditches, false trenches, etc.

From the article:

The Russian "Surovikin line" slows down the Ukrainian counteroffensive. It's moving slower than expected. Putin's troops dug in behind minefields and tank ditches. They strike at the AFU units that are trying to break through to the "Surovikin line".

In another German publication, Frankfurter Rundschau, readers are told that the Ukrainian counteroffensive in a number of directions has managed to be replaced by a counteroffensive of the Russian Armed Forces. The greatest advance of the Russian Armed Forces is to the northwest of the city of Svatovo, in the Karmazinovka area, where Ukrainian troops have lost control of at least 4 settlements in recent weeks, including Sergeyevka and Novoegorovka.

At the same time, German analysts directly say that how much longer the Ukrainian counteroffensive can last, "today hardly anyone knows for sure." It is noted that Ukraine claims that large reserves have not yet been thrown into battle, but when the Ukrainian command is asked what kind of reserves they are, if many reserve brigades have already suffered losses in the Orekhov area, the AFU command prefers to remain silent, declaring secrecy.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 15.07 10:34
  • 16284
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 14.07 22:55
  • 0
Комментарий к "Сословный строй сталинского социализма. Как Ельцин и рабочий класс разрушили СССР."
  • 14.07 20:36
  • 0
О советских ОБТ
  • 14.07 18:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "А вы точно основные танки?"
  • 14.07 14:11
  • 4
Дуров: Чиновнику, «сломавшему интернет» в РФ, американцы должны вручить медаль
  • 14.07 03:01
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему израильский танк «Меркава» считается самой странной машиной нашего времени? Правда ли, что его придумали советские инженеры?"
  • 14.07 02:51
  • 1
ВВС Филиппин ожидают поставку шести дополнительных самолетов A-29B "Супер Тукано" в 4-м квартале 2026 года
  • 14.07 02:42
  • 1
The FSB thwarted Ukraine's attempt to repeat Operation Spider Web
  • 13.07 19:31
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему советский человек жил вопреки государству, а не благодаря ему"
  • 13.07 16:44
  • 0
Комментарий к "Эксперт: у России есть силы и средства для эскалации, но она их не использует"
  • 13.07 14:55
  • 1
Эксперт: у России есть силы и средства для эскалации, но она их не использует
  • 13.07 05:42
  • 1
Комментарий к "Почему религия- мракобесие: основные аргументы"
  • 13.07 01:18
  • 1
Операторов БПЛА Северного флота обучили работе с «Елками»
  • 12.07 21:42
  • 1
Комментарий к "Главный миф о танке «Абрамс» в который вы до сих пор верите"
  • 12.07 19:55
  • 0
Комментарий к "Правда ли, что Николай II был главным виновником того, что Россия не смогла победить в Первой мировой войне"