Войти

The United States did not see a threat to NATO due to the supply of cluster bombs to Kiev

1495
0
0
Image source: Фото: Global Look Press/Keystone Press Agency/Staff Sgt. Marco Gomez

The supply of cluster munitions to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, despite the lack of support from many countries, will not lead to a split in NATO. This was announced on Tuesday, July 11, by the US President's national security adviser Jake Sullivan.

"Neither the British Prime Minister (Rishi Sunak) nor any of the leaders of NATO countries have said that this threatens the unity of NATO… There is a broad measure of understanding why the United States made this decision," he said at a press conference in Vilnius, broadcast on the White House YouTube channel.

The United States approved the shipment of cluster munitions as assistance to the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) on July 7.

As it became known on July 10, the European Commission is not against the supply of cluster munitions to Ukraine for self-defense, which the United States intends to allocate. Meanwhile, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning noted that humanitarian problems may arise in the conflict zone as a result of the US sending cluster munitions to Ukraine. According to the diplomat, the parties should not add fuel to the fire.

Before that, on July 9, it turned out that the authorities of several countries within NATO criticized the US decision. This was opposed by Sunak, his Italian counterpart Giorgia Meloni and the head of the Spanish Defense Ministry Margarita Robles.

US representatives also disagree on the supply of cluster munitions to Ukraine. So, on July 8, a member of the House of Representatives from the Democratic Party, Betty McCollum, called on Washington to eliminate the remnants of cluster munitions, and not transfer them to Kiev.


The use of cluster munitions is prohibited by the Convention on Cluster Munitions, which entered into force on August 1, 2010, 123 countries have signed it, but only 110 have ratified it. Of the European countries, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Greece, Latvia, Poland, Russia, Romania, Serbia, Turkey, Ukraine, Finland and Estonia have not signed the convention.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.07 12:41
  • 16321
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 22.07 06:07
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вот почему в танках СССР ставили автомат заряжания в корпус"
  • 22.07 03:50
  • 1
Индонезия захотела построить космодром совместно с Россией
  • 22.07 03:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ту-4: советская копия B-29"
  • 22.07 03:33
  • 1
Deceive flying: how Lightning drones learned to confuse the interceptors of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
  • 22.07 01:20
  • 1
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 22.07 00:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Станут ли европейцы воевать, если до этого дойдет? (The Economist, Великобритания)"
  • 21.07 22:40
  • 0
Комментарий к "США создали дешевый Patriot"
  • 21.07 20:17
  • 5
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 21.07 12:49
  • 1
Greetings to Odessa: Russia has begun to completely isolate Ukraine from the Black Sea
  • 21.07 05:46
  • 8
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 21.07 03:48
  • 1
Российские порты прикрыли «Корветом»
  • 21.07 03:43
  • 1
США создали дешевый Patriot
  • 21.07 03:35
  • 1
Will the Europeans fight if it comes to that? (The Economist, UK)
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"