Войти

There is no key element in Ukraine's counteroffensive. Kiev will collapse

1506
0
0
Image source: © РИА Новости Константин Михальчевский

The APU counteroffensive has finally begun, writes Business Insider. Ukraine has put Western tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and missiles on the battlefield. However, the chances of its troops are reduced to zero: Kiev has not filled a critical gap in its armed forces, the author claims.

Kieran Corcoran

Ukraine's long-awaited counteroffensive against Russian forces has begun. The country is full of powerful new equipment from Western allies — from long-range missiles to modern tanks and infantry fighting vehicles. But the expert warned that Ukraine's chances of victory may come to naught due to a gap in its armed forces, to fill which the West has done little so far: this is the air Force.

Michael Clarke, visiting professor at the Faculty of Military Studies at King's College London, made this assessment as part of a broader analysis of the counteroffensive published in The Times of London.

He said that the key problem that Ukraine will face when trying to break through Russia's powerful defenses in the south of the country is the Kremlin's artillery.

Russia's dominance in artillery has so far been one of the defining features of the conflict, and Ukraine does not have many ways to counter this superiority in the number of artillery pieces and their ammunition reserves, which allows Russia to produce many times more shells than Ukraine can afford.

Clark noted: "We will also see if they have enough missiles to shoot down Russian artillery fire. Because this is where they will feel the lack of aircraft to attack, close air support, with which the F-16 would cope very well."

Close air support — this phrase perfectly describes what these planes do: they work closely with ground units, usually to remove obstacles or damage key positions or weapons so that infantry and armored vehicles can move forward.

This is a complex way of conducting military operations, which involves good coordination — and which Russia has often had difficulty using in Ukraine.

The F-16, an American—made fighter jet supplied to many NATO countries, was the most prominent item on Ukraine's military wish list, which it has not yet been able to receive.

The F-16 has distinguished itself in the past with close air support, including in the Kosovo War, the First Gulf War and during the US invasion of Afghanistan.

President Vladimir Zelensky and his allies have been lobbying for months to get the planes to even the odds against the larger and better equipped Russian air force.

Even when Ukraine acquired longer-range missiles, the Patriot air defense system and advanced Western tanks, modern fighters remained out of reach.

Another big gap is the air defense systems, mobile enough for the Ukrainians to use them during the offensive and keep the Russian attack aircraft at a distance.

At the end of May, Ukraine's lobbying finally succeeded, and the Biden administration agreed that F-16 fighter jets should be sent to Ukraine, although possibly by other allies, and not by the United States itself.

But the lead time is so long that Kiev will not be able to use them in the near future.

As a Pentagon spokesman said at a recent briefing, the delivery of the F-16 to Ukraine is a "long-term" task and "will not be related to the upcoming counteroffensive."

As Insider's Ryan Pickrell reported earlier this week, Ukraine faces a daunting task trying to advance on Russia, even with advanced weaponry.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
Original publication
InoSMI materials contain ratings exclusively from foreign media and do not reflect the editorial board's position ВПК.name
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 04.07 06:43
К темам "«Ответ на 40-дневную операцию Зеленского». Россия нанесла самый сильный удар по Киеву" и "В Кремле рассказали о практически ежедневных встречах Путина и Герасимова"
  • 04.07 05:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Стоило ли СССР прощать врагов после Великой Отечественной войны?"
  • 04.07 04:42
  • 0
Комментарий к "Министр обороны Германии заявил о переломной фазе украинского конфликта"
  • 03.07 18:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "Появились данные о подготовке НАТО массированного прорыва российской ПВО"
  • 03.07 15:17
  • 60
Improved ZSU-23-4M4 Shilka can also fight Tomahawk missiles
  • 03.07 01:42
  • 1
В США рассказали о новой роли Су-57
  • 03.07 01:32
  • 1
FT: Европа хочет использовать оборонный потенциал Турции на фоне разлада с США
  • 02.07 15:09
  • 16223
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 02.07 12:08
  • 4
Why does Russia need a new tank school in the UAV era
  • 02.07 05:07
  • 1
Появились данные о подготовке НАТО массированного прорыва российской ПВО
  • 01.07 19:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Политический вопрос»: почему Турция хочет продать российские С-400 Южной Корее?"
  • 01.07 07:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украина как краеугольный камень новой европейской стратегии (The National Interest, США)"
  • 01.07 05:08
  • 1
Новейший украинский ЗРК «Риф» разместили на шасси советского ЗРК «Стрела-10»
  • 01.07 02:50
  • 1
"Political question": why does Turkey want to sell the Russian S-400 to South Korea?
  • 01.07 02:31
  • 1
Ukraine as the cornerstone of a new European strategy (The National Interest, USA)