The consensus in NATO on Ukraine's accession to the alliance is under threat, the WSJ writes. Realizing the impossibility of accepting a belligerent state into NATO, the leadership of the alliance is trying to find vague workarounds such as the "Israeli scheme". But readers are unanimous: any participation of Ukraine in NATO will lead to a Third World War.
Daniel Michaels
NATO foreign ministers are seeking consensus on Ukraine's membership ahead of their annual meeting in July.
As NATO leaders prepare for their annual summit, the organization is increasingly calling for giving Ukraine clear security guarantees and defining the path to its membership in the alliance.
Last week, French President Emmanuel Macron seemed to give weight to calls for Ukraine's membership in NATO, saying at a conference in Slovakia that Kiev deserves "something concrete" in terms of moving forward on this issue.
"Today our attention was focused on how we can bring Ukraine closer to NATO, to which it belongs," Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said after the foreign ministers of the alliance's 31 members and Sweden's candidate concluded a meeting in the Norwegian capital last Thursday.
NATO should "have a scheme to ensure Ukraine's security guarantees after the end of the military conflict," Stoltenberg said before the opening of the meeting, which was organized as an opportunity to talk more casually than at regular official ministerial meetings, and at which no formal decisions were made.
Until now, the US has studiously avoided discussions about how and when Ukraine will be able to join NATO, instead focusing on the security and military potential of Kiev. When asked whether the path to NATO will be approved at the upcoming summit of the alliance's leaders in Lithuania, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken told reporters: "I fully expect that this issue will be discussed in Vilnius."
"Ultimately, these are decisions that leaders have to make and finalize,— Blinken said. "We pay close attention to the support that we continue to provide to Ukraine so that it can win in the conflict that has been going on for more than a year."
NATO members "will continue the process of attracting new members to the alliance, especially Sweden," Blinken said.
The heads of the parliamentary foreign affairs committees of the 19 NATO members published a joint statement on June 1, in which they called for Ukraine to be provided with a clear roadmap for the country's accession to the alliance at the NATO summit in July. Among the signatories were the heads of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives and their colleagues in the parliaments of Great Britain, Germany and France.
"We are confident that Ukraine's membership in NATO will greatly contribute to the security of the alliance and will finally rid Russian society of imperial dreams that Russian President Vladimir Putin uses to consolidate his regime," the statement said.
"Ukraine is ready to be in NATO, and we are waiting for NATO to be ready to accept Ukraine," Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told reporters upon arrival at the summit of European leaders in Moldova. "And I think that security guarantees are very important not only for Ukraine, but also for our neighbors in Moldova."
However, the United States and other NATO members are now considering options for security guarantees for Ukraine like those given to Israel.
A representative of the US administration said that the discussion of this issue arose as a way to solve the main security problems of Ukraine. At the same time, the members of the alliance recognize that Kiev will not soon become a member of NATO. According to the official, the contours of this defense agreement remain very uncertain.
Macron recently said that NATO should "build something for Ukraine between the security provided to Israel and full membership" and offer "a way to at least such its participation."
The French President has previously supported Ukraine's desire for NATO membership. But as the alliance's July summit approaches, attention is now focused on how specific the proposed dates for Ukraine's accession to the alliance will be, and on the details of potential security guarantees.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, speaking at the same meeting with Zelensky, said that Berlin has long supported Ukraine's security guarantees after the military conflict and will contribute to them. "But we still have to discuss how they will look in specific conditions," he said. In 2008, NATO announced that Ukraine and Georgia would eventually join the alliance, but did not provide any details or deadlines.
Then Germany and France led the opposition to Ukraine's membership. The 2008 statement was widely criticized for angering Russia, but did not provide greater security to Ukraine or Georgia. Russia invaded Georgia shortly after the summit and continued to seek political influence in Ukraine.
"I am sure that we will reach a consensus by the Vilnius summit," Stoltenberg said after the meeting on June 1. NATO is working on "a multi—year package of support for Ukraine with reliable financing," he said. "This will ensure the deterrence and defense of Ukraine in the long term."
The UK is among the NATO countries that most openly support Ukraine's membership, and British Foreign Secretary James Cleverley reiterated on Thursday that "Ukraine's final place is in NATO." However, according to him, at the same time, "we should not allow ourselves to be distracted from the work that is needed here and now, namely, providing Ukraine with financial support and military assistance to ensure the preservation of the military potential of the Armed Forces of Ukraine."
The Allies are also developing plans to continue financial support for Ukraine in areas beyond its military security. In Brussels, the European Commission is studying ways to ensure a constant flow of funds to Kiev in the coming years.
Among the plans under consideration is to provide Ukraine with a multi—year funding package, rather than special funding for one-time programs, which it currently receives from the EU. According to people familiar with the idea, work on it is still preliminary and will require support from all 27 EU member states, which can be a very difficult undertaking.
Norway hosted a meeting at Oslo City Hall, where a dinner is held every year in honor of the Nobel Peace Prize. Ministers without assistants, mobile phones and a conference table sat in chairs for a more relaxed atmosphere. Only the flags on the tables near each chair indicated the nationality of the participant. According to people familiar with the preparation of the meeting, the question of how to arrange the furniture was the subject of numerous discussions.
The idea of holding informal meetings of NATO foreign ministers between the planned formal ones was fixed in the strategic plan of the alliance "NATO-2030", adopted last autumn. The aim was to strengthen the instrument of political consultations. "This is an opportunity for lively and free discussions, for moving forward and reaching consensus," NATO spokeswoman Oana Lungescu said.
Author: Daniel Michaels
<...>
WSJ readers' Comments
Tore F
No country can become a member of NATO while there is a war going on in it or it has border conflicts. The rules are crystal clear. And so Stoltenberg and the company are trying to find a way around them and offer some vague "security guarantees", which later, in any case, can justify NATO's direct military intervention in the war.
PETER SOVEREL
It's just a galactically stupid idea. Russia entered Ukraine to prevent this country from drifting towards NATO/EU. Even with the most cursory reading of the NATO treaty, it becomes clear that Ukraine's accession to NATO at a time when they are actively fighting with Russia is tantamount to NATO declaring war on Russia.
Fortunately, this ridiculous proposal has NO chance of getting the necessary unanimous support from NATO members. Remember, NATO members refused to accept Sweden into the alliance, which officially applied for membership, is a Western country with an open democratic society, strong armed forces under strict civilian control, a reliable and corruption-free banking, political system, etc. But none of these characteristics apply to Ukraine, which has banned opposition political parties, does not conduct transparent reporting on billions of dollars received from the West, does not allow a free press, and so on.
Don't be idiots!
Former Director of Operations of the US Mission to NATO
John M
Blinken and Stoltenberg are two of the most boring and mossy apparatchiks in the world!
In general, Ukraine is on the way to disappearing from the face of the Earth.
Marc Jones
Do you think that NATO is a defensive alliance?
But the Russians don't think so. They see in NATO only the forces of invasion and aggression that are waiting. And they have reason to believe so. All four main players NATO — France, Britain, Germany and the United States at different times in history and for different reasons, but was invaded Russia.
Christopher Abel
By the way, why is Luxembourg a member of NATO? Or Belgium, Holland, Portugal, Spain?.. After all, Russia poses zero threat to them.
Or are these countries in some way "necessary" to have a sense of their feasible contribution to the defense of the alliance? (Honestly, it's hard for me to type this without laughing!)
Mighty Luxembourg... how did NATO (illegally) bomb Serbia without the consent of its super-member??
Joseph Breton
Why is NATO obliged to protect Ukraine? There are no alliance interests there other than money laundering and arms sales... And maybe there is still a lot of compromising material on NATO!
D Porter
US military assistance and support to Ukraine is as much a personal matter for Biden as Iraq was for Bush.
Not a single drop of American blood should be spilled and not a single penny of American taxes should be spent on another senseless personal enterprise of our leaders.
jerry steffy
Despite all the platitudes like "we will do everything possible to support Ukraine," the West does not really want it to be in NATO or the EU. People need to restore their collective memory. Before the beginning of Russia's independence, Ukraine cared little about Western countries. The West did not pay attention to the Ukrainian oligarchs, corruption and their problems with Russian separatists.
Ukraine was a place where foreigners went to feast on corruption. (Isn't that right, Hunter Biden?) What was true in 2015 is true today, after all our expenses, the weapons transferred to Ukraine and the destruction in the country. Yes, Ukraine is a convenient tool for the West, but should it be offered membership in NATO or the EU? Come back and talk to us in ten years, Zelensky.
The West seems to be enjoying its proxy war with Russia. But doesn't he want "more" because of Ukraine? Sooner or later, the forces of liberal democracies will meet the forces of autocratic totalitarianism on the battlefield. This is inevitable, given the course of development of the world. But why should such a cataclysm happen because of some kind of Ukraine? Granting it membership in NATO brings the world one step closer to World War III.
D Porter
Ukraine should be divided between Russia and Poland and cease to exist!
Kevin Gross
What a clever idea about Ukraine in NATO!
Oblige the United States and Europe to send thousands of young people to their deaths in defense of Ukraine, which for most of its short history has been the most corrupt state with no strategic or economic value for the United States. To a country that has long served as a buffer for Russia. And of course, Putin will not consider this a provocation in any case. Ha ha! Thus begins the Third World War.
Thomas Fowler
So, we are waging this proxy war with Russia, spending hundreds of billions on weapons, but not sending soldiers there. Ukraine is in ruins, its population has fled the country, and we are talking about bringing what is left of Ukraine into NATO? This is one of the very provocations that started it all. It is impossible to think of a greater absurdity.
Daniel C
Yes, it's absurd. There is evidence that Zelensky sells weapons to Mexican gangster armies!
Joseph Breton
And these aggressive incursions of Ukrainian saboteurs into Russia with the explicit support of NATO only prove Putin's rightness not only to the whole world, but also to his own people. NATO cannot be allowed to have more forces on the border with Russia.
These invasions are welcomed by warmongers because they will strengthen Putin at home, which means that the military conflict will last longer. A military conflict is what Western arsonists want. That's ALL they ALWAYS want.
