Войти

The results of the fifth OPCW Review Conference on chemical weapons caused disappointment in the EU

1205
0
0
Image source: © Nigel Treblin/Getty Images

Brussels. May 21. INTERFAX - The European Union deeply regrets that the fifth Chemical Weapons Review Conference in The Hague ended on May 19 without any significant results, the official representative of the European Foreign Service (EMU) said.

"Chemical weapons have been used repeatedly in recent years, which makes this review conference even more important. On the eve and during the conference, the EU and its member States, along with many other countries participating in the Convention (on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons - IF), worked constructively to reach consensus. Despite these tireless efforts, it was not possible to reach agreement on a final document that would strengthen the convention," reads the communique published in Brussels on Sunday.

According to the EMU representative, "it is regrettable that the Review Conference did not condemn violations of the convention by Syria, which were confirmed by the UN and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)."

Brussels believes that the absence of a final document also represents a missed opportunity to agree on the discussed guidelines for the implementation of the convention and the adaptation of the organization for its future work.

"In the current security conditions, it is more necessary than ever to comply with international law. The international community should continue to strengthen global norms against the use of chemical weapons and emphasize the importance of the Chemical weapons Convention as the most important pillar of the international disarmament and non-proliferation architecture," the document says.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.08 05:06
  • 0
Комментарий к "ПО СУЩЕСТВУ"
  • 05.08 02:36
  • 1
Ответ на вопрос "А стоит ли цитировать маршала Жукова"
  • 05.08 01:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рукопись о Баскервилях: деталь, после которой дело Холмса становится другим"
  • 05.08 01:04
  • 0
Комментарий к "Правда ли, что Россия проиграла Первую мировую из-за отсталости? Вся правда о главной военной лжи века"
  • 04.08 22:58
  • 0
Комментарий к "Медленное угасание "коалиции желающих" (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 04.08 20:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Закладка, определившая эпоху: день рождения двух морских легенд" и "Испытание океаном: история головного эсминца проекта 956, который дал имя серии"
  • 04.08 07:03
  • 1
Китайские ученые сделали ночное видение полноцветным
  • 04.08 04:51
  • 1
The slow decline of the "coalition of the willing" (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 04.08 04:40
  • 16353
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.08 01:30
  • 1
Комментарий к "Голодомор. Ложь и факты"
  • 04.08 01:09
  • 1
Комментарий к "Нравственный вакуум: Может ли атеизм обосновать добро? Христианство как опора человечности"
  • 04.08 00:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Города-предатели, встречавшие немцев как освободителей"
  • 03.08 23:00
  • 1
Solidly built: how do mobile firing groups work on the Tigers
  • 03.08 22:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Красная Армия не смогла прорвать линию Маннергейма три месяца"
  • 03.08 22:52
  • 135
МС-21 готовится к первому полету