Войти

The results of the fifth OPCW Review Conference on chemical weapons caused disappointment in the EU

1295
0
0
Image source: © Nigel Treblin/Getty Images

Brussels. May 21. INTERFAX - The European Union deeply regrets that the fifth Chemical Weapons Review Conference in The Hague ended on May 19 without any significant results, the official representative of the European Foreign Service (EMU) said.

"Chemical weapons have been used repeatedly in recent years, which makes this review conference even more important. On the eve and during the conference, the EU and its member States, along with many other countries participating in the Convention (on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons - IF), worked constructively to reach consensus. Despite these tireless efforts, it was not possible to reach agreement on a final document that would strengthen the convention," reads the communique published in Brussels on Sunday.

According to the EMU representative, "it is regrettable that the Review Conference did not condemn violations of the convention by Syria, which were confirmed by the UN and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)."

Brussels believes that the absence of a final document also represents a missed opportunity to agree on the discussed guidelines for the implementation of the convention and the adaptation of the organization for its future work.

"In the current security conditions, it is more necessary than ever to comply with international law. The international community should continue to strengthen global norms against the use of chemical weapons and emphasize the importance of the Chemical weapons Convention as the most important pillar of the international disarmament and non-proliferation architecture," the document says.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 15.10 01:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ядерный «Пионер». Каким был предок «Орешника», который пугал Европу 40 лет назад"
  • 15.10 00:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ствол как рудимент: почему артиллерия теряет смысл"
  • 14.10 23:11
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Не большевики погубили Россию»: историк Спицын раскрыл, почему Российская империя была обречена задолго до 1917 года"
  • 14.10 19:14
  • 1
Комментарий к "Дискуссия после речи генерала Гринкевича на Варшавском форуме по безопасности (The Guardian, Великобритания)"
  • 14.10 15:35
  • 1
Ту-214 сократят экипаж
  • 14.10 09:38
  • 1
Discussion after General Grinkevich's speech at the Warsaw Security Forum (The Guardian, UK)
  • 14.10 07:46
  • 0
Комментарий к "О революции большевиков, танках и любви к Родине"
  • 14.10 01:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Первый блок транспортного дока "Амур" вывели из цеха"
  • 14.10 00:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Три признака отступления Америки (The Hill, США)"
  • 13.10 23:49
  • 0
Комментарий к "Танк Т-14 "Армата" сравнили с Ferrari - чем он лучше суперкара"
  • 13.10 22:52
  • 0
Комментарий к "В НАТО заявили, что намеренно скрывают суть последствий применения 5-й статьи"
  • 13.10 21:42
  • 1
Trump helps Putin in economic confrontation with Ukraine (The New York Times, USA)
  • 13.10 17:28
  • 2
Самый мощный в мире пулемет КПВТ для борьбы с дронами получил "Кречет"
  • 13.10 13:44
  • 1
Compactness and accuracy: Why fighters praise the SIDS sniper rifle
  • 13.10 13:20
  • 3
Комментарий к "Объект 292: Т-80 с огромной 152-мм пушкой. Зачем СССР поставил на танк орудие почти от самоходки"