Войти

Japan and the EU rejected the US proposal in the G7 to impose a complete ban on exports to Russia

1756
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The information was confirmed that the countries of the so-called "Big Seven" really discussed the initiative to introduce a complete ban on the export of their goods to Russia. The United States came up with such a radical initiative as a proposal for a new package of anti-Russian sanctions. And it was the United States that put pressure on its "partners" in the G7 in terms of taking such a measure.

Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, speaking at the seminar "Knowledge", commented on this American initiative. According to him, the light did not converge in a wedge on the G7.

Siluanov:

If necessary, we will buy from others.

But, as it turns out, agreement on the American sanctions proposal has not been reached in the G7. According to the Financial Times, Japan and EU countries opposed the proposal to completely ban exports to Russia. The statement of the members of the Japanese delegation and the EU delegation is given:

It is impossible to take such measures as a complete ban on exports to Russia.

The publication refers to three sources who are familiar with the discussion of this problem and who confirm that the EU and Japan rejected the American proposal.

Tokyo and Brussels refused to support the US initiative, as they understand how all this can turn out for them. Russia may stop supplying oil and LNG to Japan against the background of the fact that Japan received an exception for the "price ceiling" from the package of previous sanctions and against the background of the fact that Russian energy resources occupy a significant niche in the Japanese economy.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 28.10 06:17
  • 1
Комментарий к "27 самолётов в год: Су-34 и Су-35 — это много или мало?"
  • 28.10 02:52
  • 0
О делах русских и православных - в 1943 г.
  • 27.10 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Члены парламента предупредили, что подлодки Королевских ВМС не способны отразить атаку арктического флота России (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 27.10 21:40
  • 2
Франция предложила разместить истребители с ядерным оружием в 10 странах
  • 27.10 21:13
  • 0
Ликвидация насаждения безграмотности, или по поводу "Как СССР опроверг марксизм и материализм: ликбез"
  • 27.10 19:57
  • 1
ВКС России получили партию Су-57 в новом облике
  • 27.10 19:51
  • 1
Комментарий к "Подготовка к интервенции. Что затеяла НАТО у российских границ"
  • 27.10 18:11
  • 1
Members of Parliament warned that the Royal Navy submarines are not able to repel the attack of the Russian Arctic fleet (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 27.10 18:06
  • 2
Пентагон планирует к 2035 году увеличить парк истребителей ВВС США до 1500 машин
  • 27.10 05:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "От Шэньчжэня до Майами: в чьих руках окажется «глобальный рубильник»"
  • 26.10 23:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "Как можно было легко и просто избавиться от дефицита товаров в СССР? Почему Политбюро так и не решилось на этот шаг"
  • 26.10 18:32
  • 1
Сувалкский коридор: немцы репетируют «Drang nach Osten»
  • 26.10 18:06
  • 1
Preparation for the intervention. What is NATO doing at the Russian borders
  • 26.10 15:18
  • 0
Снова захотелось переговоров, но не всем одинаково
  • 26.10 12:39
  • 1
В США заявили об устаревании стратегической авиации