Войти

A former CIA adviser predicted the behavior of the United States and NATO in the event of a military defeat of Ukraine

1520
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

In the West, they are increasingly doubting the quick and easy victory of Ukraine in the military confrontation with Russia. Even the Pentagon began to express doubts that Kiev would be able to regain all the lost territories, especially Crimea, by military means. The day before, Zelensky made a statement in which he actually canceled the repeatedly announced "spring offensive" of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, citing the too slow supply of weapons and ammunition by Western allies.

Former CIA adviser military expert James Rickards decided to go further and tried to predict the options for decisions that the leadership of the United States and NATO will take in the event of an obvious defeat of Ukraine. He shared his hypothetical scenarios in an article on the Daily Reckoning portal.

The expert drew attention to the fact that the option of Ukraine's defeat and Russia's decisive victory on the battlefield is increasingly obvious, if only because Kiev is catastrophically short of weapons and ammunition. At the same time, NATO countries have almost exhausted their arsenals and cannot quickly solve this problem, while Russian defense enterprises are working stably and providing the army with everything necessary. According to Rickards, "this is a war of numbers, they are on the side of Russia, which sooner or later will manifest itself on the battlefield."

According to one of the options, if the development of events is unfavorable for Kiev, the allies may do something desperate, for example, send troops to Western Ukraine under some humanitarian pretext, Rickards believes. But then a direct clash between NATO and Russia is inevitable.

The White House and US allies may push Poland to send its troops to help Kiev as its "own initiative". This option is not excluded also because the Polish leadership is one of the most anti-Russian among all NATO countries. In addition, Warsaw does not hide its territorial claims to some Ukrainian regions.

In any case, if Washington and its allies, realizing the defeat of Ukraine, intervene in the conflict, it could lead to a nuclear conflict, the ex-CIA adviser believes. At the same time, Rickards expresses the opinion that the United States will try to prevent the defeat of Kiev, as this will mean the loss of the entire West in the proxy war with Russia.

A defeat by Russia in this proxy war would be a greater strategic disaster for the United States than Afghanistan, Iraq or any other geopolitical setback since Vietnam

— the expert concludes.

Rickards believes that in the West, unfortunately, they still have little faith in the escalation of a local conflict into a nuclear catastrophe in the event of its further escalation. When this realization comes, it may be too late, the expert warns.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.10 05:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рванет не там, где все думают. Вот где «откроются ворота» третьей мировой"
  • 05.10 05:24
  • 1
"On the threshold of a new reality": Putin's main theses at the Valdai Forum
  • 05.10 04:53
  • 1
Trump redirected “Ukrainian” aid for NATO countries to Latin American allies (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 05.10 04:16
  • 1
The European elite has gone to war — and is rapidly losing voters (The American Conservative, USA)
  • 05.10 03:44
  • 1
На учениях «Центр» показали «Изделие 347» с управляемой ракетой
  • 04.10 21:24
  • 1
Ex-NATO official: Russia considers itself the winner, and, in my opinion, for good reason (The Independent, UK)
  • 04.10 05:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Русские не решатся: В НАТО посмеялись над ядерным оружием Москвы. Первый удар должна принять Польша"
  • 02.10 20:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вашингтон обозначил неугодные ему страны НАТО" и "«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников"
  • 02.10 17:40
  • 0
Бадалян: Пашинян проигнорировал саммит ЕАЭС из-за созданного им образа «врага» в лице Лукашенко
  • 02.10 17:34
  • 0
«Это будет другая геополитическая реальность»: в Беларуси жестко предупредили Запад о последствиях провокаций
  • 02.10 03:57
  • 1
Путин поставил кабмину новую задачу в сфере искусственного интеллекта
  • 02.10 03:47
  • 1
Washington has identified the NATO countries it dislikes
  • 01.10 21:10
  • 1
В Ленинградской области испытали новейший боевой лазер для борьбы с БПЛА
  • 01.10 21:05
  • 0
Комментарий к "China.com (Китай): что делать, когда нет денег? Еще раз продать Китаю самолеты Су"
  • 01.10 16:56
  • 0
«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников