Войти

The former head of military intelligence of the Czech Republic called the tactics of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation the most dangerous for the Armed Forces

1235
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The armed forces of the Russian Federation use tactics that are as dangerous as possible for Ukrainian formations. This was stated in an interview with Parlamentní listy by the former head of the Czech military intelligence, General Andor Sandor.

According to the military expert, the Russian army, through incessant artillery shelling, forces Ukrainian formations, firstly, to bear maximum losses, and secondly, to constantly be in tension and spend their ammunition.

The West transfers military equipment to the Armed Forces with a great delay. Western countries also cannot cover all the needs of Ukrainian formations in weapons and ammunition. They simply do not have the amount of shells and ammunition that the Ukrainian army needs for daily battles, the Czech general stressed.

The former head of the Czech military intelligence said that strategically, the Kiev regime has already lost in the armed conflict with Russia. Interestingly, earlier the general spoke about the limited capabilities and reserves of Western states in terms of supporting the Kiev regime with weapons and ammunition.

Such statements by foreign military experts clearly run counter to the ambitious speeches of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky and his closest associates. But on the other hand, they explain the constant delays of the West with the supply of weapons, including the story of the tanks promised to Ukraine, which, as it turned out, for the most part, it is impossible to immediately convey.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"