Image source: topwar.ru
The American edition of The New York Times published material that once again speaks about the strangeness of the approach to the preparation of operations by the enemy. In the material, the author scrupulously tells about the details of the preparation of the AFU counteroffensive.
Recall that not so long ago, a material was published on the Military Review with reference to the channel "The Inside of the military", where it was noted that the Ukrainian announcements of a counteroffensive on certain sections of the front do not turn out to be disinformation in the end: "Richard Sorge and the Cambridge Five are not needed – the enemy himself tells in detail about where and when approximately it will come." As an example, the announcements and subsequent attacks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the Kharkiv and Kherson directions were given.
And so, an article was published in the NYT edition, where it tells about the testing of two counteroffensive options by the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces at training grounds in Germany. We are talking about the territory of American military bases, where several thousand mobilized Ukrainian servicemen are undergoing combat coordination.
Option one is a counteroffensive in the northeast and east – in the direction of Lugansk and Donetsk. Obviously, with an attempt to break through the defense line of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation on the Svatovo-Kremennaya site.
The second option is a strike in the Zaporozhye region with the aim of cutting Russia's land corridor to the Crimean Peninsula.
The revelations of Western journalists from a military point of view may seem like an attempt to promote disinformation. But, as already noted, usually the enemy himself announces the directions of his alleged attacks and it is in these directions that attacking actions are taken.
And again, I would like to hope that our command managed to study such information trends from the enemy with the adoption of appropriate measures.
