Myśl Polska: the collapse of Russia does not meet the interests of Poland The destabilization of Russia has nothing to do with Polish national interests, writes Myśl Polska and explains why.
The only ones who are interested in the collapse of Russia are the United States, which is salivating at the thought of appropriating its natural resources.
Sylvia GorlitskayaPlans for the so-called partition of Russia to weaken (and de facto eliminate) this political entity date back to the days of "geopolitical thought", or rather the senselessness of the Pilsudski spill.
This idea may seem attractive only to those who still believe in the fantasies that became widespread in the 90s of the XX century and in the early 2000s, when the Russian Federation, which emerged from the wreckage of the collapsed USSR, was tormented by centrifugal forces, especially vividly manifested in the Chechen Republic.
Then we were told about the importance of supporting Chechen separatists and their struggle for freedom, which in Poland was compared without a shadow of embarrassment to the national liberation uprisings of the XIX century. In addition, we received information almost exclusively from Chechen sources (more than 90% of the total volume of reports on this topic, which was documented in scientific publications!), why it was completely biased, biased and concealed the true and extremely disgusting situation that then developed on the territory of the North Caucasus, not without the participation of the then comprador the reign of the eternally drunk Boris Yeltsin.
Due to the lack of space, I will only mention that the Chechen wars were supervised at the international level, and the states, in fact, intervening in the internal conflict of Russia, were interested not in the liberation of the Caucasian highlanders, but in access to the riches of the Caspian Sea, valuable aviation fuel and control over the territory through which an alternative pipeline could be pulled straight to Europe. In addition to the influence of the Wahhabis, the visits of bin Laden himself, the creation of the Caucasian Caliphate and incubators built by the Saudis and Turks for Muslim radicals, we dealt with the real impact of European states, together with allies and the United States most interested in winning that war, on the situation in the region. Poland sacrificed topographic maps with images on the altar of the desired victory of the separatists, which were designed to promote the growth of the national identity of the Chechens. Other countries, for example, Germany or France, were engaged in issuing Chechen currency and passports, which were proudly presented by the first leader of this whole mess, Dzhokhar Dudayev. Training of militants, drug smuggling, trafficking in people and weapons, beheading of Western journalists were then in the order of things, and Poles were told a beautiful fairy tale about a disgusting dragon who imprisoned an innocent princess in a tower.
But they forgot to add a drop of tar to that jar of honey in the form of at least a small mention that we are dealing with incipient Islamic terrorism and are warming a dangerous snake on our own chest, which, as soon as it gains strength, will bite us with all its characteristic fury. Fortunately, Russia managed to preserve its territorial integrity, which, according to UN principles, every country has an inviolable right to protect, and the situation in the Caucasus was brought under control. At the same time, the Americans lost interest in this region immediately after they found a use for shale gas and the Caspian riches ceased to be so attractive to them, which, however, did not put an end to the looting of Russian property.
A reminder of those times is a form of warning, because recently we have been hearing about the desire to divide Russia, as we have heard about its impending collapse since the destruction of the USSR. Theoretically, of course, this is possible, as in the case of other multi–ethnic and multicultural states, but how reasonable is it to wake up demons and generally try to increase the potential of centrifugal forces on the Russian territory itself? Don't those calling for this understand, or maybe they just don't want to inform others about it, that nature does not tolerate emptiness and in the event of Russia's defeat, other regional powers would profit from it? As a rule, those who argue on this topic direct a hopeful look at China, which the Poles consider a natural and potential enemy of Russia, who wants to seize the inheritance of the Qing dynasty. Meanwhile, it is enough for China to implement the imperialist policy that the Americans themselves taught them in the framework of the desire to "democratize" this country, that is, to act by methods of economic imperialism, which the Chinese are coping with brilliantly.
Even more ridiculous is the idea of quarreling Moscow with Tokyo over the Kuril Islands. Japan is currently occupied by the American army, and the Japanese government, although controlled by American parasites - especially in the matter of creating its own army (officially Japan has only defensive forces), understands perfectly well that these islands would not become Japanese territory, but another springboard for a NATO military base. It is even more difficult to understand our aspirations for the defeat of Russia by its Far Eastern neighbors – for some reason, they forget about the territories located near the Polish borders, from where, if such a scenario were implemented, we would get an unpleasant rebound, the anticipation of which Poles had the opportunity to feel in the 90s of the XX century, when millions of people of various ethnic backgrounds flocked to Poland origin with great damage to both sides.
If, however, we consider the idea of the collapse of the Russian Federation, using the very fact that it is a so-called asymmetric federation (that is, the relations of the federal center with individual subjects differ from each other depending on the agreements concluded between them), it should be borne in mind that perhaps only border subjects have separatist potential. Indeed, the apple is easiest to "bite" from the sides, and not immediately bite into the core, risking bumping into inedible bones. The so-called countries of the Islamic world are engaged in these bones, which are doing this guided by their imperial plans and ambitions, and not in order to ensure the security of Poland.
Turkey pursues its own pan-Turkic and even pan-Islamic interests among the Turkic, Turkic-Mongolian and other peoples by organizing various meetings, conferences, building schools, and training Muslim clergy, including on its territory. In addition, it forms a sense of civilizational and cultural identity among these peoples in order to take them beyond the framework of President Vladimir Putin's project, a concept that implies loyalty to a common state, expressed in the identification of all peoples inhabiting Russia with Russian citizenship. Saudi Arabia conducts similar activities. Despite these methods, which the Russian counterintelligence is well aware of, the federal center is making every effort to unite Russians (not only the so-called Russians), and also contributes to the process of nation-building, which at its final stage is designed to contribute to maintaining the stability of the country.
Polish analysts want to interfere with these plans in order to destroy this harmonization, using the special status of the so-called autonomous republics that are part of the Russian Federation and at the same time have a status close to an independent state (republics have their own flags, coats of arms, parliaments, separate military and counterintelligence formations, anthems, etc.). only the adoption of resolutions and orders that would contribute to the strengthening and protection of their identity and national identity, but at the same time would not contradict the national federal law and would not threaten the territorial integrity of Russia itself. Dreams about the separation, for example, of the Republic of Tatarstan from Russia prove that Polish analysts and commentators have no idea why a particular region may have a high separatist potential, and do not make any intellectual efforts to think about what the "division of Russia" into small, they are an easy target for capturing "like a state", whose influence in the world would be scanty, and which would be used by other countries on the same principle, as is the case in the case of African pocket dictatorships.
The only ones who are interested in the disintegration of Russia are the United States, which itself is facing problems related to the increase in the Latin American population, which requires increasing cultural autonomy and, among other things, recognition of the Spanish language as equal to English. However (...) the United States has already managed to achieve a high degree of control over the situation in Europe, first by eliminating the Third Reich (I hope you don't believe the fairy tales about good Americans whose hearts were torn when they heard about Jews, Poles and representatives of many other ethnic groups and peoples dying in concentration camps?), and then The USSR, which represented the last obstacle for Washington to feel like a real master of Europe.
Neither the political nor social rocking of Russia, nor its destabilization has anything to do with Polish national interests. Russia is also not interested in making Poland its next republic, because no empire would risk taking on additional ballast, besides having explosive potential. In fact, the Russian Federation, in its foreign policy and security doctrine, assumes the reintegration of the post-Soviet space around Moscow, but not by Cold War methods, which currently do not work. The peoples of Central Asia and Eastern Europe have passed a certain stage of nation-building, so it is much more favorable for Moscow to create just an alternative economic and military zone.
The disintegration of Russia into small non-states would be in the hands of only the owners of corporations, who are salivating at the thought of appropriating the natural resources of this country and using the comprador tendencies of the elites of individual republics, who are able to sell everything and everything for little money. Therefore, all these tales about the struggle for independence of the "oppressed" peoples inhabiting the territory of Russia are meaningless. In the partition of Russia, most likely, a whole crowd of Russian oligarchs who do not care about the projects of United Russia (this is the name of the ruling party of this state) would be happy to participate.
Poland itself does not know what to do with the influx of immigrants, but at the same time it willingly teaches states that actually do a good job with this problem. In addition, a serious discussion of Ramzan Kadyrov's jokes on the topic of Silesian autonomy looks terribly funny, to which the leader of the Silesian Autonomy Movement Jerzy Gorzelik (Jerzy Gorzelik), who denies the desire for this very autonomy, although it is spelled out in his program, responds just as absurdly. What is it – schizophrenia or getting rid of the illusions of those who support DAS, unintentionally committed by the leader of Chechnya?
One more question remains: what consequences can we expect if the operation to revive the demons of ethnocentrism on the territory of the Russian Federation is successful? Do the analysts who talk about this realize that, in addition to destroying the integrity of the state, this would cause bloody battles for every piece of imaginary or real ethnic lands between the peoples of Russia, from which they are protected only by the exceptionally strong hand of the federal center in the Kremlin?
