Войти

British Tories have called on the Chancellor of the Exchequer to abandon the reduction of the military budget against the background of the Ukrainian conflict

1001
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

As a result of the events in Ukraine, the UK should abandon the planned reduction of the armed forces and military spending. This is stated by representatives of the Conservative Party of the United Kingdom, referring to the Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt.

Senior Tories are calling on the head of the finance department to abandon plans to reduce military spending and increase budget funding for the armed forces. In particular, Hunt is asked to keep the number of armed forces at the level of 76 thousand people, and not to reduce it to 73 thousand people by 2025, as previously planned.

Recall that back in 2021, the British authorities were going to reduce the size of the army. But a special military operation in Ukraine, according to British Tories, demonstrates the inconsistency of these plans. London also does not rely much on allies in continental Europe. Defense Minister Ben Wallace also agrees with the need to increase the military budget by up to 11 billion pounds in two years.

But plans to increase military spending may face a serious obstacle in the form of concerns of government representatives about inflation in the country. The standard of living of Britons has recently "sunk" significantly.

Public discontent is growing, and inevitably there will be those political forces that will exploit the "Ukrainian question", accusing the government of spending too much money to support the Kiev regime. Nevertheless, Conservative MPs are very concerned about the possible reduction in the number of personnel of the royal armed forces.

James Sutherland, who served as an army officer for 26 years and is now a member of parliament, argues that the reduction of the army in the current situation is unacceptable.

Tobias Ellwood, chairman of the defense committee of the House of Commons, says that it would be too naive to rely on certain cyber capabilities and therefore reduce the number of units designed to conduct ground warfare.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 14.10 01:15
  • 8
Украина вряд ли получит ракеты Tomahawk из-за опасности конфликта РФ и США
  • 14.10 01:01
  • 2
Why is the training Yak-130 being converted into a combat one?
  • 14.10 00:32
  • 1
В США признали угрозу С-300 для F-35
  • 13.10 23:33
  • 10823
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 13.10 20:19
  • 25
Improved ZSU-23-4M4 Shilka can also fight Tomahawk missiles
  • 13.10 15:07
  • 0
Искусственный интеллект - реальность, которую поздно отрицать
  • 12.10 18:54
  • 0
Похоже, истерика с "передачей Tomahawk'ов" бандерлогам иссякла
  • 12.10 13:35
  • 144
ChatGPT-4 и нейросети (ИИ) спешат на помощь ГШ ВС РФ и Российской армии
  • 12.10 08:32
  • 2
В США рассказали о кошмаре «опережающего физику» российского МиГ-41
  • 12.10 06:01
  • 6
В тему "обнуления Томагавков" и прочих БПЛА
  • 12.10 05:37
  • 1
"The battle for the key nodes." What is the Russian army preparing in its combat zone?
  • 11.10 09:39
  • 11
Основатель Amazon объявил о создании тяжелой космической ракеты
  • 11.10 08:20
  • 2
I am the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Poland. And here's how to negotiate with Putin (The New York Times, USA)
  • 10.10 19:22
  • 0
Ответ на "Систем ПВО и ПРО России оказалось недостаточно для отражения атак ВСУ"
  • 10.10 18:51
  • 1
Ответ на "Убийцей крылатых ракет "Томагавк" является 2С38 "Деривация-ПВО""