Войти

Russian military commander: By taking the initiative in Zaporozhye, we are destroying NATO's very dangerous plans

1303
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The Zaporozhye direction was considered by many Western experts as the most promising for a massive offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In addition, representatives of the Zaporozhye CAA have repeatedly stated that Kiev is concentrating forces to strike in the direction of Melitopol and Berdyansk.

At the same time, in the last few days, the Russian Armed Forces have been conducting very successful offensive actions in the Zaporozhye region, which, according to Russian military commander Alexander Sladkov, is an extremely important and timely step.

By taking the initiative in Zaporozhye, we are destroying NATO's very dangerous plans

- the expert writes in his TG channel .

Sladkov explained that if the Russian army had not delivered a preemptive strike, the AFU would sooner or later have launched an offensive on Melitopol and Berdyansk in order to cut the land corridor to the Crimea, as "Western strategists" have repeatedly said. According to the military commander, in case of a successful maneuver, the Ukrainian troops would cut off our Kherson group from supplies (only the Crimean Bridge would remain) and everything else would put an end to the plans for the construction of the Rostov-Crimea highway.

Meanwhile, Sladkov stressed that the current offensive actions of the Russian Armed Forces deprive the Armed Forces of the opportunity to carry out a strategic offensive planned by the NATO command. Moreover, the expert noted that the Russian troops are building up forces along the entire width of the front and can themselves launch an offensive in any direction.

The aforementioned successes of the Russian army, according to Sladkov, became possible thanks to the partial mobilization carried out earlier.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 24.03 01:04
  • 2
Нужна ли России морская авиация, и, если да, то какая?
  • 24.03 00:08
  • 787
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 24.03 00:06
  • 15071
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 23.03 22:40
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Россия не может создать конкурентоспособный автомобиль, но производит лучшие в мире истребители?"
  • 23.03 21:06
  • 0
Комментарий к "Пехота ВСУ меняет свою тактику"
  • 23.03 14:38
  • 26
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 23.03 04:35
  • 1
The Ukrainian Armed Forces infantry is changing its tactics
  • 23.03 04:14
  • 3
ЦАМТО: союзники США заняли выжидательную позицию после призыва Трампа отправить корабли в Персидский залив
  • 23.03 01:59
  • 1
Бортников заявил о способности России привести в чувства спецслужбы Украины
  • 23.03 01:47
  • 1
Комментарий к "Главком ВМФ: заменим все устаревшие многоцелевые АПЛ на современные "Ясени""
  • 22.03 20:12
  • 0
Комментарий к "Путин: российские оборонные наработки еще пригодятся"
  • 21.03 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названы российские подлодки 2050-х"
  • 21.03 21:16
  • 0
По поводу "Что было бы, если Российская империя продолжала бы существовать".
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)
  • 21.03 19:01
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать?