Войти

The military commander published a 2020 Ukrainian memo with prices for the "destruction of military equipment of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation"

2761
1
0

Image source: topwar.ru

There is less and less doubt that Russia was provoked to start its own. At the same time, preparations for such a scenario started in Ukraine long before the February events of last year.

A very interesting manual, which was released in Kiev back in 2020, was published in his TG channel by Russian military commander Alexander Sladkov.

The brochure received a very specific name: "Memo to participants in countering armed aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine."

However, its content indicates even more eloquently the preparation for an armed confrontation with our country. The memo contains information about the rules of conscription for mobilization, benefits for military personnel, payments, as well as remuneration for captured and destroyed Russian military equipment.

In the latter case, the "price" itself is of particular interest. For example, for a destroyed SAM, a Ukrainian serviceman is entitled to a payment of 121,800 hryvnia, for MLRS – 60,900 hryvnia, for an armored personnel carrier – 42,630 hryvnia, etc.

Image source: topwar.ru

Based on these amounts, it becomes obvious that initially the cost was calculated in foreign currency (most likely in dollars), and only then, during the publication of the brochure, it was translated into hryvnia at the exchange rate.

Thus, the conclusion suggests itself that the scenario with the "Russian invasion" in the West was prepared long before the beginning of our SVO. Consequently, the current conflict was inevitable, because the United States and its allies would have found a way to draw Russia into a confrontation with Ukraine in any case. And the obvious option is that Ukrainian troops would move to Donetsk, Lugansk and Crimea.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Comments [1]
№1
20.01.2023 12:36
Вся предыстория начала СВО говорит о том, что не только это было подготовлено НАТО, но даже сам момент начала был выбран ими.
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.08 02:20
  • 0
Об эсминцах, раз уж пошел разговор о возобновлении их постройки в РФ
  • 01.08 00:27
  • 0
Комментарий к "Один стационарный С-200 закрывал площадь сорока дивизионов С-75"
  • 31.07 19:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ"
  • 31.07 19:02
  • 2
Russia has announced its first destroyer program in 40 years. Urgently needed: Ocean-going warships (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
  • 31.07 18:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Россия объявила о первой за 40 лет программе создания эсминцев. Срочно требуются: океанские боевые корабли (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 31.07 18:37
  • 16347
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 31.07 18:09
  • 1
Госкомвоенпром: ОАО "АЛЕВКУРП" усовершенствовало оптико-электронную систему для ЗРК
  • 31.07 18:00
  • 1
Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ
  • 31.07 17:37
  • 1
Sea revenues: The Caspian Flotilla acquired its own aircraft
  • 31.07 17:18
  • 1
Минобороны: Россия обладает опытом создания масштабных группировок ПВО
  • 31.07 07:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чем же была более всего сильна промышленность Российской империи"
  • 31.07 05:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чего Европе ждать от задуманной США “НАТО 3.0”? (The Spectator, Великобритания)"
  • 31.07 05:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия потерпеть поражение в Первой Мировой Войне?"
  • 31.07 01:56
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Суворов взял «неприступный» Измаил, имея меньше солдат, чем защитников"
  • 31.07 01:37
  • 1
What can Europe expect from the US-conceived “NATO 3.0”? (The Spectator, UK)