Войти

American edition: The US Department of Defense opposed the transfer of long-range small-diameter SDB bombs to Ukraine

1532
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The US Department of Defense considered it unnecessary to transfer high-precision long-range bombs of small diameter (SDB) to Ukraine, since such a task would require too much time to assemble ammunition. This is reported by the American edition of Foreign Policy, citing sources in the US military.

Earlier, the Reuters news agency spread information that the giant of the American defense industry, Boeing, made a proposal to supply Ukraine with high-precision ammunition for ground-based complexes. The company assured that their use would make it possible to strike at the rear of Russian troops, far from the line of contact.

However, the military department believes that the fighting is proceeding at a rapid pace. Therefore, bombs, which will take a considerable time to deploy, may already be unnecessary by the time the fighting ends.

The Pentagon emphasizes that the modification of the SDB into a small-diameter ground bomb will take many months. Analysts from the Foundation for the Defense of Democracy in Washington, John Hardy and Bradley Bowman estimated that the transfer of 2 launchers and 24 bombs could occur 9 months after the Pentagon approved such a plan, and 12 installations and 750 bombs the United States will be able to transfer only by the end of 2024.

Recall that the US administration has not yet agreed to transfer long-range ATACMS missiles to Ukraine, although the Kiev regime insists on acquiring them, dreaming of striking deep into Russian territory. But the US leadership fears a further escalation of the armed conflict and the involvement of other countries in it.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 06.10 07:28
  • 1
Польша представила новую тяжелую боевую машину пехоты
  • 06.10 06:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Пушка «Арматы» оказалась хуже советской – всего 800 выстрелов и 125 мм. А куда делась «царь-пушка» для «царь-танка»?"
  • 06.10 04:28
  • 1
The Ukrainian Armed Forces have prepared a "war plan" with Russia for 30 years. How Drapaty is changing the army
  • 05.10 23:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Заказан головной итальянский эсминец нового поколения"
  • 05.10 17:36
  • 0
С широко закрытыми глазами
  • 05.10 15:13
  • 1
The lead Italian destroyer of the new generation has been ordered
  • 05.10 14:51
  • 1
Hunters of the "small sky"
  • 05.10 05:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рванет не там, где все думают. Вот где «откроются ворота» третьей мировой"
  • 05.10 05:24
  • 1
"On the threshold of a new reality": Putin's main theses at the Valdai Forum
  • 05.10 04:53
  • 1
Trump redirected “Ukrainian” aid for NATO countries to Latin American allies (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 05.10 04:16
  • 1
The European elite has gone to war — and is rapidly losing voters (The American Conservative, USA)
  • 05.10 03:44
  • 1
На учениях «Центр» показали «Изделие 347» с управляемой ракетой
  • 04.10 21:24
  • 1
Ex-NATO official: Russia considers itself the winner, and, in my opinion, for good reason (The Independent, UK)
  • 04.10 05:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Русские не решатся: В НАТО посмеялись над ядерным оружием Москвы. Первый удар должна принять Польша"
  • 02.10 20:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вашингтон обозначил неугодные ему страны НАТО" и "«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников"