Войти

American edition: The US Department of Defense opposed the transfer of long-range small-diameter SDB bombs to Ukraine

1391
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The US Department of Defense considered it unnecessary to transfer high-precision long-range bombs of small diameter (SDB) to Ukraine, since such a task would require too much time to assemble ammunition. This is reported by the American edition of Foreign Policy, citing sources in the US military.

Earlier, the Reuters news agency spread information that the giant of the American defense industry, Boeing, made a proposal to supply Ukraine with high-precision ammunition for ground-based complexes. The company assured that their use would make it possible to strike at the rear of Russian troops, far from the line of contact.

However, the military department believes that the fighting is proceeding at a rapid pace. Therefore, bombs, which will take a considerable time to deploy, may already be unnecessary by the time the fighting ends.

The Pentagon emphasizes that the modification of the SDB into a small-diameter ground bomb will take many months. Analysts from the Foundation for the Defense of Democracy in Washington, John Hardy and Bradley Bowman estimated that the transfer of 2 launchers and 24 bombs could occur 9 months after the Pentagon approved such a plan, and 12 installations and 750 bombs the United States will be able to transfer only by the end of 2024.

Recall that the US administration has not yet agreed to transfer long-range ATACMS missiles to Ukraine, although the Kiev regime insists on acquiring them, dreaming of striking deep into Russian territory. But the US leadership fears a further escalation of the armed conflict and the involvement of other countries in it.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 19.06 20:04
  • 13
Запад готовится к превентивным ударам по базам ВМФ России, заявил Патрушев
  • 19.06 19:51
  • 16120
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 19.06 19:15
  • 4
Заглушенные Россией спутники Starlink получили «необратимые повреждения»
  • 19.06 17:19
  • 3
Why are Russian satellites better for their Starlink
  • 18.06 16:22
  • 0
Комментарий к "Журналист рассказал о «свинцовом облаке» для защиты ядерных ракет"
  • 18.06 16:09
  • 1138
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 18.06 05:40
  • 1
The military commander called for strikes on bridges and the elimination of the leadership of Ukraine
  • 18.06 02:12
  • 0
О Черноморском флоте в ходе СВО. Ценность, участие, потери.
  • 17.06 19:15
  • 0
Ответ на вопрос о целесообразности модернизаций ПЛА в Dzen'е
  • 17.06 09:54
  • 1
НАСА профинансирует создание спутника-инспектора
  • 17.06 06:01
  • 0
Комментарий к "Польша приостановила передачу советских истребителей МиГ-29 Украине"
  • 17.06 05:52
  • 0
Комментарий к "У России предостаточно баллистических ракет. Украина не знает, как их остановить (The New York Times, США)"
  • 17.06 04:50
  • 0
Комментарий к "Эрих Вад о конфликте на Украине: "Это мясорубка, как Верден в 1916 году" (Berliner Zeitung, Германия)"
  • 16.06 23:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "Киев хочет получить $20 млрд, чтобы заставить Россию "гореть" (Politico, США)"
  • 16.06 19:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "Игнат: ЗРК Patriot сумели перехватить меньше половины российской баллистики"