Войти

American edition: The US Department of Defense opposed the transfer of long-range small-diameter SDB bombs to Ukraine

1261
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The US Department of Defense considered it unnecessary to transfer high-precision long-range bombs of small diameter (SDB) to Ukraine, since such a task would require too much time to assemble ammunition. This is reported by the American edition of Foreign Policy, citing sources in the US military.

Earlier, the Reuters news agency spread information that the giant of the American defense industry, Boeing, made a proposal to supply Ukraine with high-precision ammunition for ground-based complexes. The company assured that their use would make it possible to strike at the rear of Russian troops, far from the line of contact.

However, the military department believes that the fighting is proceeding at a rapid pace. Therefore, bombs, which will take a considerable time to deploy, may already be unnecessary by the time the fighting ends.

The Pentagon emphasizes that the modification of the SDB into a small-diameter ground bomb will take many months. Analysts from the Foundation for the Defense of Democracy in Washington, John Hardy and Bradley Bowman estimated that the transfer of 2 launchers and 24 bombs could occur 9 months after the Pentagon approved such a plan, and 12 installations and 750 bombs the United States will be able to transfer only by the end of 2024.

Recall that the US administration has not yet agreed to transfer long-range ATACMS missiles to Ukraine, although the Kiev regime insists on acquiring them, dreaming of striking deep into Russian territory. But the US leadership fears a further escalation of the armed conflict and the involvement of other countries in it.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 12.02 11:47
  • 74
"To break through island chains." China has given a powerful response to the Pentagon
  • 12.02 11:15
  • 1
If the "Cart" gets up: questions from the military and reflections of military officers
  • 12.02 08:45
  • 1572
Корпорация "Иркут" до конца 2018 года поставит ВКС РФ более 30 истребителей Су-30СМ
  • 12.02 08:12
  • 99
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 12.02 06:41
  • 0
Комментарий на "Контракты на экспорт российских истребителей Су-57 на Ближний Восток "уже есть". Самый вероятный заказчик — Иран (Military Watch Magazine, США)", и "СМИ предрекли смещение баланса сил на Ближнем Востоке при продаже Су-57"
  • 12.02 05:49
  • 1
Комментарий к "Как становится лучше истребитель Су-57"
  • 12.02 05:01
  • 1
В «Ростехе» оценили эффективность антидронового «Зубра»
  • 12.02 04:48
  • 14176
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 12.02 04:48
  • 1
Госкомвоенпром Беларуси представляет ударный беспилотный комплекс нового поколения "Квадро-М"
  • 12.02 01:53
  • 1
The Limits of Russian-Ukrainian-American negotiations (Stratfor, USA)
  • 12.02 01:46
  • 0
По поводу направлений совершенствования тактической авиации РФ.
  • 12.02 00:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "Линкор класса "Трамп" против "Адмирала Нахимова" (The National Interest, США)"
  • 11.02 22:22
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США оценили «морских терминаторов» из России"
  • 11.02 21:46
  • 1
Вершина диванно-искпердного идиотизма. Комментировать не буду - наслаждайтесь. :)
  • 11.02 21:22
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали главную характеристику Ту-160М"