Войти

American edition: The US Department of Defense opposed the transfer of long-range small-diameter SDB bombs to Ukraine

1051
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The US Department of Defense considered it unnecessary to transfer high-precision long-range bombs of small diameter (SDB) to Ukraine, since such a task would require too much time to assemble ammunition. This is reported by the American edition of Foreign Policy, citing sources in the US military.

Earlier, the Reuters news agency spread information that the giant of the American defense industry, Boeing, made a proposal to supply Ukraine with high-precision ammunition for ground-based complexes. The company assured that their use would make it possible to strike at the rear of Russian troops, far from the line of contact.

However, the military department believes that the fighting is proceeding at a rapid pace. Therefore, bombs, which will take a considerable time to deploy, may already be unnecessary by the time the fighting ends.

The Pentagon emphasizes that the modification of the SDB into a small-diameter ground bomb will take many months. Analysts from the Foundation for the Defense of Democracy in Washington, John Hardy and Bradley Bowman estimated that the transfer of 2 launchers and 24 bombs could occur 9 months after the Pentagon approved such a plan, and 12 installations and 750 bombs the United States will be able to transfer only by the end of 2024.

Recall that the US administration has not yet agreed to transfer long-range ATACMS missiles to Ukraine, although the Kiev regime insists on acquiring them, dreaming of striking deep into Russian territory. But the US leadership fears a further escalation of the armed conflict and the involvement of other countries in it.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 10.06 00:03
  • 0
Почему стратегическая авиация ранее была частью СЯС, а теперь - фактически быть ею перестала.
  • 09.06 23:39
  • 0
Ответ на "Подсчитана частота перехвата авиабомб ВСУ российскими С-300"
  • 09.06 22:57
  • 9341
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 09.06 10:00
  • 2
Ukraine's successes warm our hearts. But we must prepare for retribution (The Times, UK)
  • 09.06 09:49
  • 2
Russia's strategic aviation can be protected on a budget and effectively.
  • 09.06 09:26
  • 1
Военкор: без победы над противником на всех фронтах, включая диверсионный, будущего у нас нет
  • 09.06 09:00
  • 1
Су-30 будут играть ключевую роль в укреплении воздушного потенциала Мьянмы - премьер-министр
  • 09.06 07:32
  • 0
По поводу "Успехи Украины греют нам душу. Но мы должны готовиться к возмездию (The Times, Великобритания)"
  • 09.06 06:16
  • 1
Российский эксперт предупредил о конце доминирования дронов в бою
  • 09.06 05:53
  • 1
Experts talk about protecting airfields of the Russian Air Force after an attack carried out by FPV drones
  • 09.06 04:28
  • 0
Ответ на "Зеленский объяснил удары по аэродромам России попыткой повлиять на США"
  • 09.06 03:55
  • 1
Ответ на "«Сеет ужас в мире». На Западе испугались новой российской подлодки"
  • 08.06 13:25
  • 4
"Spreading terror in the world." In the West, they were afraid of the new Russian submarine
  • 08.06 09:11
  • 3
Пентагон объявил тендер на технологию защиты бронетехники от дронов
  • 07.06 19:58
  • 0
Что делать? :) (C)