Войти

The United States believes that Ukraine will not be able to deploy Patriot air defense until 2024

1326
0
0
Image source: © AP Photo / Sebastian Apel

MWM: the US Congress warned about the serious danger of Patriot supplies to UkraineContrary to general assumptions that Patriot deliveries to Kiev will begin in the first half of 2023, the preparation of local repair crews alone will take approximately 53 weeks, writes MWM.

Ukraine will be given only one battery, and this raises serious questions about its effectiveness.

The US Congressional Research Service warned of problems "both of a legislative and supervisory nature" in connection with the delivery of Patriot surface-to-air missile systems to Ukraine. Earlier, it was announced as part of a $1.85 billion aid package. The report emphasizes that, contrary to general assumptions that Patriot deliveries will begin in the first half of 2023, the training of local repair crews alone will take approximately 53 weeks. "Extensive preparations are to be made before the current Patriot system is established in Ukraine on the ground," it says. Previously, it was assumed that Patriot systems would be accompanied by military personnel of the United States and other NATO countries, as the role of Western personnel in military operations in Ukraine is expanding. Later, the Russian Foreign Ministry said that it had received assurances from the United States that the US military would not be present at Patriot facilities. However, the chance that the systems will be accompanied by American military contractors remains significant. At the same time, it is expected that Russia will have much less doubts when delivering targeted strikes if the systems are not controlled by the US military.

It is expected that only one Patriot battery will be delivered to Ukraine, and this raises serious questions about its effectiveness in repelling Russian air and missile attacks — especially given the dubious combat experience of the system in other theaters of military operations. The Congressional Research Service stressed that it is still unclear where the Patriot battery will come from, urging lawmakers to work on this issue. She warned that the battery sent to Ukraine and the interceptors associated with it could be taken "from existing existing army units and warehouses of the US armed forces." "If it is withdrawn from other operational forces — for example, the US Central or Indo-Pacific Command, this is fraught with additional costs and potential risks in these theaters of military operations," the report says. At the same time, it is noted that the supply of batteries from the mainland of America "may complicate the process of training or modernization." The report also highlights the "huge price" of Patriot: in particular, it clarifies that the cost of the new Patriot battery is about $ 1.1 billion, including about $ 400 million for the system itself and about $ 690 million for missiles (while their approximate cost is estimated at $ 4 million apiece). As a result of these costs, there may be "certain restrictions" in the scope of Patriot application in Ukraine — against which types of enemy systems the battery can in principle be used.

Low-level attack drones, which have played a key role in Russian strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure and personnel, cost only a few thousand dollars a piece, while some of its cruise missiles are estimated at about $ 1 million. Another point hotly debated in the context of Patriot supplies, although not noted in the report of the Congressional Research Service, is that the rapid destruction of the complexes ("Of course we will click, one hundred percent," as President Putin put it) will undermine both the morale of Ukrainians and the confidence of allies in the missile system, which is considered a stronghold of the American forces. Finally, the rapid deterioration of the Ukrainian air defense network and the extremely limited number of Patriot systems, combined with their relatively limited mobility, can make them extremely vulnerable. However, strengthening Ukraine's air defense is considered a crucial step, since its arsenals of Soviet S-300 and Buk missiles, previously huge, have been depleted, and Russian strikes on strategic infrastructure increase the risk that key Ukrainian cities will become uninhabitable. Western analysts warned more and more about this prospect at the end of 2022. The powerful attacks on infrastructure that began in October are increasingly seen as a means of pressure to put pressure on Kiev and its allies, thanks to which Russia will be able to achieve its goals faster, despite significant setbacks on the battlefield.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
Original publication
InoSMI materials contain ratings exclusively from foreign media and do not reflect the editorial board's position ВПК.name
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 15.03 11:25
  • 2
Николай Патрушев призвал создать в России Национальный исследовательский центр судостроения
  • 15.03 11:25
  • 8070
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 15.03 06:58
  • 1
Тенденции развития космической отрасли: космос требует интеллекта
  • 15.03 01:23
  • 0
Ответ на "Названо основное преимущество самолета-невидимки B-21 перед B-2"
  • 15.03 00:14
  • 0
Немного о ЗРК/ЗУР - для диванных искпердов, интеллигентов, и "гуманитариев" :)
  • 14.03 21:57
  • 0
Ответ на "Европейский аналог Patriot столкнулся с проблемами на Украине"
  • 14.03 21:13
  • 0
Ответ на "Алиев: большая часть пунктов текста мирного договора между Азербайджаном и Арменией уже согласована"
  • 14.03 20:47
  • 0
Ответ на "Россия осторожно взвешивает план прекращения огня на Украине, а США торопятся заключить соглашение (Reuters, Великобритания)"
  • 14.03 20:27
  • 0
Ответ на "Британия слишком самодовольна, труслива и агрессивна, чтобы победить в войне (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 14.03 19:21
  • 0
Ответ на "Трамп выбрасывает на помойку победу Америки в холодной войне (The Hill, США)"
  • 14.03 18:55
  • 0
Ответ на "Конец "эры войн": США отказались решать чужие конфликты"
  • 14.03 14:34
  • 0
С соседями выгоднее дружить и торговать, чем воевать
  • 14.03 14:22
  • 2758
Как насчёт юмористического раздела?
  • 14.03 13:22
  • 8607
Минобороны: Все авиаудары в Сирии пришлись по позициям боевиков
  • 14.03 08:59
  • 307
Космонавтика Илона Маска