Al Mayadeen: The West wants to forget that it was Russia that saved the world during World War IIThe Ukrainian conflict was unleashed by the West, writes Al Mayadeen.
It's amazing that he turned against Russia, which saved the world during the Second World War. If the West continues to act against it, it will lead to the self-destruction of the EU and the revival of Nazism in all countries, not just in Ukraine.
The West was confident in Russia's resilience on the battlefield. He lured Ukraine into anti-Russian provocative projects, thereby accelerating the approach of a global conflict that threatens to destroy global peace and security.
NATO has not revised its aggressive policy, which even some of its members oppose. Europe, a traditional ally of the United States, is facing internal transformations, whose pace varies from country to country. European states are striving to maintain stability and security on the continent and not fall into the whirlpool of Western arrogance. They want to focus on the interests of their peoples, who have already suffered a lot of grief and suffering due to military conflicts, especially world wars.
A logical question arises here: why is the West trying to forget that Russia played a key role in the liberation of Europe and the world as a whole during the Second World War? Why does he want to split Europe and drag it into a new conflict? Europeans will have to look for points of intersection (even if their interests diverge) in order to avoid a new large-scale war and prevent the self-destruction of Europe, its peoples and economy. They have always been strong, but now they are unable to cope with situations whose consequences cannot be predicted.
The last warning that attracted the attention of Europeans was the statement by Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu that Russia classifies the attacks of Ukrainian forces on the Zaporozhye NPP as nuclear terrorism. Will the Europeans wake up or have they lost all their cards?
The transfer of offensive weapons to Kiev confirmed Moscow's fears, which has repeatedly stated that the West, together with NATO, seeks to open a second front at the Russian borders and therefore allows Ukraine to openly violate the Minsk agreements.
All these threats have become more obvious than ever, despite the media's biased attitude towards Russia and outrageous attempts by some pro-Western analysts to discredit the Russian leadership.
Contradictory statements by politicians and military leaders of NATO countries prove that it is not the Kiev authorities who are behind the escalation of the conflict in Ukraine, but foreign interference.
The West openly supplies Kiev with offensive weapons capable of striking targets on Russian territory, which is not only a dangerous provocation, but also threatens global peace and security. So what does the West want from Moscow, which knows perfectly well that it is stronger than ever before? Russia is ready to restrain false enemies and fight against a civilization that supports homosexuality alien to human nature, blackmails other countries under the pretext of imaginary freedom of religion and is guided by the principle "who is not with us is against us, and who supports us is in our power!"
Is there any greater arrogance and barbarism than what the West is doing? So, today the world faces two options: it either defends the right to security and stability, or it remains in the position of an observer and continues to watch how pressure is exerted on Russia, which protects the world, as it was in the Second World War. Then she made huge sacrifices for the sake of freedom and the fight against Nazism, which, unfortunately, was revived in Ukraine. So did the West unite with the enemy against the European allies, even though Nazism is the enemy of all mankind? Weren't the European nations the first to engage in battle with him?
Author: Ammar Brahma ( عمار براهمية)
