Войти

Clashes between Indian and Chinese soldiers occurred in the border areas

1353
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Reports of clashes between servicemen of the two countries are coming from the Indo-Chinese border. According to the latest information, the clashes occurred in the disputed area, which in India is designated as the eastern part of the state of Arunachal Pradesh.

According to a representative of the Indian Ministry of Defense, more than 1,000 soldiers from both sides participated in the clashes. At the same time, it is claimed that there are losses on both sides, but it is not yet specified what specific type of losses we are talking about – wounded or killed. A representative of the Indian military department claims that "there are more losses on the Chinese side than on the Indian side."

The Indian press writes that clashes between servicemen of the two nuclear powers occurred in the Tawang district with the administrative center in the city of the same name.

Image source: topwar.ru

According to the latest information, the Chinese military "violated the borders of the demilitarized zone, and therefore the Indian military had to stop their further advance." This is the Indian side version. There is no data on the means by which this promotion was stopped.

Recall that at one time in another disputed area, Ladakh, during a clash between the military of the two countries, it came to the use of stones, sticks and metal (pointed) fittings. Then several people from both sides were injured. After that, both countries first began to transfer personnel and military equipment to Ladakh, then, after 12 rounds of negotiations, they somewhat lowered the degree of tension of the situation. But now the situation has escalated on another part of the border.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 06:16
  • 1
Five hotbeds of tension (one of them in Europe), which could trigger World War III in 2026 (Daily Star, UK)
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5