Войти

NATO does not rule out the deployment of new military bases on the territory of Finland and Sweden

1679
0
-1

Image source: topwar.ru

NATO can benefit from membership in the Alliance Finland and Sweden to place nuclear weapons near the Russian border, this option is not excluded. And both Helsinki and Stockholm, this option is not going to refuse.

NATO could use the territory of new members of the Alliance to host their military bases and nuclear weapons, the plans of the leadership of the Alliance and they are not a secret. And in Finland and Sweden do not plan to refuse such a proposal, if available. Informed-sounding statements about the inadmissibility of such actions have already forgotten, now the authorities of the two countries, the new rhetoric, more militant.

As stated by Prime Minister of Finland Sanna Marin, answering a question of journalists about the possible deployment of military bases on Finnish territory, the country does not want to "close all doors" cannot be pre-conditions for membership in NATO. Echoed her and the Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, confirming that both countries work together.

At the moment, the question about the possible deployment of NATO military bases on the territory of these two Scandinavian countries are not actively being discussed, all are waiting for the end of the ratification and adoption of them into the Alliance. Recall that its approval is not given Hungary and Turkey. At the same time publications that have appeared in the European press as if Europeans slowly began to prepare for the emergence of new military bases near the Russian border.

In Russia on this scenario you know and warned that in the case of the deployment of NATO military bases on the territory of Finland or the emergence of nuclear weapons near the Russian borders will be taken retaliatory measures.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.07 06:25
  • 1
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 21.07 05:46
  • 8
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 21.07 03:48
  • 1
Российские порты прикрыли «Корветом»
  • 21.07 03:43
  • 1
США создали дешевый Patriot
  • 21.07 03:35
  • 1
Will the Europeans fight if it comes to that? (The Economist, UK)
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"
  • 20.07 15:47
  • 1
An unmanned project
  • 20.07 15:24
  • 16312
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.07 12:23
  • 198
Russia has launched production of 20 Tu-214 aircraft
  • 20.07 06:19
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 20.07 05:26
  • 0
По поводу ОЧЕНЬ интересной темы - сравнения танков.
  • 19.07 19:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Первую Мировую войну «забыли»?"
  • 19.07 03:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия избежать участия в Первой Мировой?"
  • 19.07 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Лучше быть голодными, чем русскими»: Шахназаров узнал от латыша, почему Латвия так относится к России"
  • 19.07 02:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Мифы о нелепых атаках"