Five billion dollars from the United States for Ukraine. Jan Charnogursky is even afraid to imagine where they settledThe West is to blame for the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine, former Slovak Prime Minister Jan Czarnogurski said in an interview with Parliament listy.
NATO supplies Kiev not only with weapons, but also with trained fighters. So she became an active participant in military operations, the politician noted.
Tomasz ProhazkaEurope is still threatened by migration, primarily due to the fault of the West and, most importantly, the United States of America, which unleashed a war in the Middle East and, having overthrown Gaddafi, facilitated the way for refugees from Africa to Europe.
This is stated by the veteran of Slovak politics Jan Czarnogurski (Ján Čarnogurský). (...)
Parlamentní listy: Are you afraid that Europe will face the problem of migration again? How will the armed conflict in Ukraine affect this?Jan Charnogursky: I must say that migration remains an important topic, but as for Ukrainians specifically, the situation is as follows now.
The number of those who come to Slovakia is approximately equal to the number of those who return back to Ukraine. So I don't see a problem here. And in Poland, the situation is not as catastrophic as the media sometimes say.
— Where do you think the threat of migration comes from? From Belarus, the Russian Federation, Ukraine or Africa, which, under the influence of global warming and due to lack of water, is gradually becoming uninhabitable?— You know, I wouldn't mix global warming in here.
We clearly see that the United States of America and Western Europe are to blame for migration from Africa and the Middle East, primarily from Libya, Iraq and Syria, which thus shot itself in the foot. After all, under the influence of the United States and with the support of Great Britain and France, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi was overthrown. No matter how authoritarian a ruler he was, at least he kept migration under control. Due to outside interference, this brake or, if you like, the fuse broke, and therefore refugees flooded Europe.
And now remember Iraq, where the Americans invaded after the events of September 11, 2001 to find non-existent weapons of mass destruction. It was just an excuse. However, the presence of Americans in Iraq also contributed to the wave of migration.
Look at the map and you will see that it was countries such as the Russian Federation and Belarus that played the role of a kind of protective zone for Europe, but now everything has changed, because Russia has no reason to help Europe in any way now. Therefore, there may be a lot of refugees again.
— "Europe itself will lose the most from the conflict in Ukraine." These are your words, and they are confirmed. How do you assess the current events in Ukraine?— Yes, it looks like Ukraine has launched an offensive.
But I would not see this as a turning point leading to the defeat of the Russian Federation. I must say that the North Atlantic Alliance, which was conceived exclusively as a defense alliance, supplies Ukraine not only with weapons, but also with its own trained fighters. They know how to handle such equipment as Hymars systems. After all, in a short period of time, a sufficient number of Ukrainians would not be taught this. Thus, NATO has actively engaged in this armed conflict.
— German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in a telephone conversation called on Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the conflict through peaceful negotiations. Do you think it's possible?— Of course, one cannot refuse either negotiations or meetings and discussions if there is at least a small chance of success in the form of an agreement, ending the conflict and signing a peace treaty.
Vladimir Putin also cannot afford to ignore the West.
But judging by the discussions that are being held on Russian TV channels, and there is no reason to consider these conversations exclusively propaganda, then Russians are afraid of peace. They assume that even if they agree to it, the West can fully arm Ukraine and train its soldiers in a couple of months, and then it will become an even more serious opponent for the Russian Federation.
— Do you still blame the West for the beginning of the conflict?— <...> The West has a large share of responsibility, because it could not understand the mentality of people in those regions, their problems, priorities, and most importantly, the history and complexity of relationships.
Historically, Ukraine has been forming the most important foothold of Russia for a hundred years. This is a supporting part of the Russian perimeter, the territory of Russian influence.
And the United States of America reports that it has spent five billion dollars so that the Ukrainian people can choose their politicians. What this amount was actually spent on, I'm even afraid to imagine.
