Войти

Kadyrov called on Russians to support the fighters participating in the special operation in Ukraine

1349
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The head of Chechnya Ramzan Kadyrov criticized skeptical commentators claiming that Russian troops allegedly retreat and lose the Ukrainian army. According to him, our command has its own tactics and strategy, and the Russians need to support the fighters that are in the area ITS.

Kadyrov made an entry in my TG channel, saying that if he were commander in chief, would enter on the territory of Russia the military situation, and Ukraine are allowed to use any weapons, because we are fighting against NATO. However, he said, this is a personal opinion, as a citizen of Russia. And as the head of the Republic, he helps guide the country to win this war and follows orders.

According to the leader of Chechnya, the Russian generals know how to apply this knowledge in order to win. And they would have to give orders to not always popular actions, like a tactical retreat, or other maneuver. Unlike the enemy, our other tactics aimed at saving the lives of civilians and military personnel.

Will calm the most violent and the most skeptical commentators. During ITS nowhere and we will not back down. It's all stuffing and Western provocation. Don't let yourself fool (...)

- he wrote.

Kadyrov urged not to criticize our military, not waving his sword, sitting on the couch, and to help to the best of their ability, at least morally, the same words support online.

So, friends, let's not swing a sword on the couch, and better find the right words of support to our soldiers and pray for them to all come back alive and well, with a victory

he added.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"