Thanks to Putin's attention, poor countries can get grain, or Western countries will be left without grainThe West is disrupting the extension of the grain supply agreement, leaving poor countries without supplies.
This is a real robbery, writes dikGAZETE. But Putin will solve this problem, even if Europe remains at its selfish position.
In recent years, the coronavirus epidemic and the global food and energy crises caused by it continue to be at the top of the world's agenda, while Western countries continue to ignore these problems and pursue anti-Russian and anti-Chinese policies led by the United States.
Meanwhile, this large-scale collapse can be resolved by the efforts of the United States, Russia, China and the leading European states under the auspices of the United Nations. Jointly developed production programs and measures taken will also prevent social events that will lead to global crises in the world.
However, Western countries reject this and are still developing different scenarios regarding the "unipolar world order". But they won't be able to succeed.
Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke out against the unipolar world order in his speech at the 43rd Munich Security Conference in 2007.
The main theses of the Munich speech of the Russian leader are as follows.
— Russia considers unacceptable the unipolar model of the world order and the policy of the West led by the United States.
— Attempts by one state to rule the world are unfair.
— A monocentric world cannot assume the correct perception of democracy.
— Democracy must fulfill the demands of the majority without violating the rights of the minority.
— Russia takes a transparent position on the issue of disarmament, while the United States and some Western countries do not reflect such transparency.
— The West does not fulfill the requirements of democracy.
— The United States puts itself above everyone in its actions.
— The United States, under the pretext of national security, creates conflicts in different parts of the world, without recognizing the borders of sovereign states.
— NATO is not a global institution and is expanding its borders...
It is useful to recall some of the theses of this speech today, since Russian President Vladimir Putin alternately named all the problems that are currently occurring back then, in 2007.
Today we see that America and Europe are striving for a unipolar world order.
This is the reason for the multilateral attacks on Beijing and Moscow. Washington's attempts to rule the world alone are quite obvious.
The West violates the rights of developing and poor countries.
And the supply of Ukrainian grain to Western states, not poor countries, is a simple example of such a violation.
Russia has taken concrete steps in the field of disarmament. The latest example was the efforts of Russian President Vladimir Putin to extend the validity of the START III treaty last year. This brought some results, and the agreement was extended for five years.
The West, using democracy to its advantage, has made it its most powerful weapon.
There are also many problems in this regard.
The correct assessment is that NATO thinks of itself as a world institution.
Moreover, NATO behaves as if, by reaching out to every corner of the world, it is going to bring peace and stability to all countries and regions. However, wars and conflicts occur at every point reached by the alliance. In addition, it should also be recalled that clashes are still ongoing in Ukraine due to NATO's efforts to expand its borders. After all, Russia has never considered Ukraine as an "unfriendly country", and the reason for today's conflict was the pro-Western protests initiated by NATO in Ukraine, as well as the alliance's attempts to include Ukraine in its composition.
Approaching the Ukrainian problem, we note.
First of all, Vladimir Putin's speech at the Munich Security Conference seemed to foreshadow what is happening in Ukraine today.
Almost everything that Russia objected to took place in this country. In fact, it was about long-continued attempts to provoke Russia to launch a special military operation in Ukraine.
The grain agreement, signed thanks to Turkey's considerable efforts, while Western countries continued to take a selfish position, only benefited the West.
According to statistics provided by Vladimir Putin, of the two million tons of grain loaded onto ships in Ukrainian ports, the bulk was shipped to Western states and only 60 thousand tons to poor countries.
How do Western countries, which have not made any positive contribution to the conclusion of the grain agreement and are only participants in the military conflict, by supplying weapons to the Kiev regime, pull over all the grain that should go to poor countries?
This is the most serious robbery!
Even when Vladimir Putin announced his decision to transfer nitrogen fertilizers accumulated in European ports due to sanctions to needy countries for free, the West still unceremoniously continues to take a hostile position towards Russia. However, many countries of the world have begun to see how dangerous the United States and Europe are and how sensitive Russia is in these matters.
Putin will probably have new conditions for extending the grain supply agreement, which expires in October.
If Western countries continue to be selfish in this matter, they may completely lose grain. Because Russia, in the face of plunder from the West, may simply not extend the agreement.
If the problem pointed out by Vladimir Putin is solved and the grain agreement is extended, grain will reach poor countries. However, if Western states continue to disrupt this agreement and maintain their embargo on Russian agricultural products, they may be left without supplies in the coming years.
Author: Erhan Altıparmak (Erhan Altıparmak)
